Federal Institute of Sul de Minas Gerais, Muzambinho, Brazil.
Federal Institute of Mato Grosso do Sul (IFMS), Navirai, Brazil.
J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Jul;104(9):5442-5461. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13379. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
Climate influences the interaction between pathogens and their hosts significantly. This is particularly evident in the coffee industry, where fungal diseases like Cercospora coffeicola, causing brown-eye spot, can reduce yields drastically. This study focuses on forecasting coffee brown-eye spot using various models that incorporate agrometeorological data, allowing for predictions at least 1 week prior to the occurrence of disease. Data were gathered from eight locations across São Paulo and Minas Gerais, encompassing the South and Cerrado regions of Minas Gerais state. In the initial phase, various machine learning (ML) models and topologies were calibrated to forecast brown-eye spot, identifying one with potential for advanced decision-making. The top-performing models were then employed in the next stage to forecast and spatially project the severity of brown-eye spot across 2681 key Brazilian coffee-producing municipalities. Meteorological data were sourced from NASA's Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources platform, and the Penman-Monteith method was used to estimate reference evapotranspiration, leading to a Thornthwaite and Mather water-balance calculation. Six ML models - K-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), random forests (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and gradient boosting regression (GradBOOSTING) - were employed, considering disease latency to time define input variables.
These models utilized climatic elements such as average air temperature, relative humidity, leaf wetness duration, rainfall, evapotranspiration, water deficit, and surplus. The XGBoost model proved most effective in high-yielding conditions, demonstrating high precision and accuracy. Conversely, the SVM model excelled in low-yielding scenarios. The incidence of brown-eye spot varied noticeably between high- and low-yield conditions, with significant regional differences observed. The accuracy of predicting brown-eye spot severity in coffee plantations depended on the biennial production cycle. High-yielding trees showed superior results with the XGBoost model (R = 0.77, root mean squared error, RMSE = 10.53), whereas the SVM model performed better under low-yielding conditions (precision 0.76, RMSE = 12.82).
The study's application of agrometeorological variables and ML models successfully predicted the incidence of brown-eye spot in coffee plantations with a 7 day lead time, illustrating that they were valuable tools for managing this significant agricultural challenge. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.
气候显著影响病原体与其宿主之间的相互作用。这在咖啡行业尤为明显,咖啡叶斑病病原菌咖啡茶云孢菌会导致褐斑病,从而大幅降低产量。本研究聚焦于利用融合农业气象数据的各种模型来预测咖啡褐斑病,以便至少在发病前一周进行预测。数据来自巴西圣保罗和米纳斯吉拉斯州的八个地点,涵盖了米纳斯吉拉斯州南部和塞拉多地区。在初始阶段,校准了各种机器学习(ML)模型和拓扑结构来预测褐斑病,确定了一种具有进行高级决策潜力的模型。然后,在下一步中,使用表现最佳的模型对 2681 个巴西主要咖啡生产城市的褐斑病严重程度进行预测和空间预测。气象数据来自美国宇航局的全球能源资源预测平台,使用彭曼-蒙特斯公式估算参考蒸散量,进而采用桑斯威特和马瑟水量平衡法进行计算。共使用了 6 种 ML 模型——K 最近邻(KNN)、人工神经网络多层感知机(MLP)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)和梯度提升回归(GradBOOSTING),并考虑到疾病潜伏期来定义输入变量。
这些模型利用了平均空气温度、相对湿度、叶湿持续时间、降雨量、蒸散量、水分亏缺和盈余等气候要素。XGBoost 模型在高产量条件下表现最为出色,具有较高的精度和准确性。相反,SVM 模型在低产量情况下表现出色。褐斑病的发病率在高、低产量条件下差异明显,且存在显著的区域差异。咖啡种植园中褐斑病严重程度的预测准确性取决于两年一次的生产周期。高产量树木使用 XGBoost 模型(R=0.77,均方根误差,RMSE=10.53)的效果较好,而 SVM 模型在低产量条件下表现更好(精度 0.76,RMSE=12.82)。
本研究应用农业气象变量和 ML 模型成功地对咖啡种植园中褐斑病的发生进行了 7 天提前预测,表明这些模型是应对这一重大农业挑战的有用工具。 © 2024 化学工业协会。