Berlin School of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10665-1.
Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of prehabilitation as a new preoperative care pathway to optimise perioperative outcomes, its implementation into routine health care is widely pending. Frail patients might particularly benefit from prehabilitation interventions, but facilitating and hindering factors need to be considered in the implementation process. Thus, our aim was to derive a programme theory on what prehabilitation programmes work for frail patients in what circumstances and why.
Following Pawson's realist review approach, preliminary programme theories on facilitators and barriers were established. General and topic-specific databases were searched systematically for facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients. Articles were included if they dealt with multimodal prehabilitation programmes prior to surgery in a frail population and if they contained information on facilitators and barriers during the implementation process in the full text. Based on these articles, refined programme theories were generated.
From 2,609 unique titles, 34 were retained for the realist synthesis. Facilitating factors included the individualisation of prehabilitation programmes to meet the patients' needs and abilities, multimodality, adaption to the local setting and health care system, endorsement by an ambassador and sharing of responsibilities among a multidisciplinary team. Central barriers for frail patients were transportation, lack of social support, and inadequate, overwhelming information provision.
Implementing prehabilitation as a new care pathway for frail patients requires organisational readiness and adaptability to the local setting. On an individual level, a clear understanding of responsibilities and of the intervention's goal among patients and providers are necessary. Added attention must be paid to the individualisation to fit the needs and restrictions of frail patients. This makes prehabilitation a resource-intense, but promising intervention for frail surgery patients.
PROSPERO (CRD42022335282).
尽管有证据表明预康复作为一种优化围手术期结局的新术前护理途径是有效的,但将其纳入常规医疗保健仍广泛存在。虚弱的患者可能特别受益于预康复干预,但在实施过程中需要考虑促进和阻碍因素。因此,我们的目的是得出一个关于预康复计划在什么情况下对虚弱患者有效以及为什么有效的方案理论。
根据 Pawson 的现实主义审查方法,初步建立了促进因素和障碍的初步方案理论。系统地在一般和主题特定数据库中搜索了预康复在虚弱患者中实施的促进因素和障碍。如果文章涉及到针对虚弱人群的术前多模式预康复计划,并且在全文中包含了实施过程中的促进因素和障碍信息,则将其纳入。基于这些文章,生成了改进的方案理论。
从 2609 个独特的标题中,保留了 34 篇文章进行现实主义综合。促进因素包括个体化预康复计划以满足患者的需求和能力、多模式、适应当地环境和医疗保健系统、由一位拥护者认可以及多学科团队之间分担责任。虚弱患者的主要障碍是交通、缺乏社会支持以及信息提供不足和负担过重。
将预康复作为一种新的护理途径为虚弱患者实施需要组织准备和适应当地环境。在个人层面上,患者和提供者必须清楚地了解责任和干预的目标。必须特别注意个体化以适应虚弱患者的需求和限制。这使得预康复成为资源密集型但有前途的虚弱手术患者干预措施。
PROSPERO(CRD42022335282)。