2nd Clinic of Neurology, Târgu Mures County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Târgu Mureș, Romania.
University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mures, George Emil Palade, Gh. Marinescu Street No 38, 540142, Târgu Mures, Romania.
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 14;14(1):3676. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54299-z.
Continuous intra-jejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is a long-term proven and effective treatment in advanced Parkinson's Disease (APD). Efficacy and safety of 16-h administration of LCIG has already been established. Additional benefits of 24-h LCIG administration have been reported in several case series and small clinical studies. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the characteristics of patients who needed 24-h LCIG from the beginning of the DAT (device-aided treatment) with those who remained with the standard 16-h LCIG treatment and to identify particular motives if any. We initiated LCIG in 150 patients out of which in case of 62 patients (41,3%) due to unsatisfactory initial clinical benefits continuous 24-h LCIG was deemed necessary. Despite the subjective complaints and more severe clinical condition, at baseline evaluation we found statistically significant differences between 16-h LCIG cohort and 24-h LCIG cohort only in case of incidence of freezing (47% vs 65%, p = 0.03) and sudden off (32% vs 48%, p = 0.04). Wake hours/daytime LCIG does not always sufficiently improve the patient's quality of life in some patients due to persistent nighttime troublesome symptoms. Instead of labeling the patient as a non-responder, it is worth trying the 24-h LCIG dosage in a carefully selected group of patients, as there is currently no consensus on reliable criteria that serve the decision in these patients.
肠内持续输注左旋多巴-卡比多巴凝胶(LCIG)是一种经过长期验证且有效的晚期帕金森病(APD)治疗方法。LCIG 16 小时给药的疗效和安全性已经得到证实。多项病例系列和小型临床研究报告了 24 小时 LCIG 给药的额外益处。本回顾性研究的目的是比较从 DAT(设备辅助治疗)开始就需要 24 小时 LCIG 的患者与仍接受标准 16 小时 LCIG 治疗的患者的特征,并确定是否存在特定的动机。我们对 150 名患者启动了 LCIG 治疗,其中由于初始临床疗效不佳,有 62 名患者(41.3%)需要持续 24 小时 LCIG。尽管存在主观抱怨和更严重的临床状况,但在基线评估中,我们发现 16 小时 LCIG 组和 24 小时 LCIG 组之间仅在冻结(47% vs 65%,p=0.03)和突然无反应(32% vs 48%,p=0.04)的发生率方面存在统计学显著差异。在一些患者中,白天清醒时间/LCIG 并不能始终充分提高患者的生活质量,因为夜间仍存在麻烦症状。在这些患者中,目前没有可靠的标准来决定是否采用 24 小时 LCIG 剂量,因此,不应该将患者标记为无反应者,而值得在精心挑选的患者群体中尝试 24 小时 LCIG 剂量。