Yang Ou, Yong Jongsay, Zhang Yuting
Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Health Econ. 2024 Jun;33(6):1192-1210. doi: 10.1002/hec.4811. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
The Australian government pays $6.7 billion per year in rebates to encourage Australians to purchase private health insurance (PHI) and an additional $6.1 billion to cover services provided in private hospitals. What is the justification for large government subsidies to a private industry when all Australians already have free coverage under Medicare? The government argues that more people buying PHI will relieve the burden on the public system and may reduce waiting times. However, the evidence supporting this is sparse. We use an instrumental variable approach to study the causal effects of higher PHI coverage in the area on waiting times in public hospitals in the same area. The instrument used is area-level average house prices, which correlate with average income and wealth, thus influencing the purchase of PHI due to tax incentives, but not directly affecting waiting times in public hospitals. We use 2014-2018 hospital admission and elective surgery waiting list data linked at the patient level from the Victorian Center for Data Linkage. These data cover all inpatient admissions in all hospitals in Victoria (both public and private hospitals) and those registered on the waiting list for elective surgeries in public hospitals in Victoria. We find that one percentage point increase in PHI coverage leads to about 0.34 days (or 0.5%) reduction in waiting times in public hospitals on average. The effects vary by surgical specialities and age groups. However, the practical significance of this effect is limited, if not negligible, despite its statistical significance. The small effect suggests that raising PHI coverage with the aim to taking the pressure off the public system is not an effective strategy in reducing waiting times in public hospitals. Alternative policies aiming at improving the efficiency of public hospitals and advancing equitable access to care should be a priority for policymakers.
澳大利亚政府每年支付67亿澳元的回扣,以鼓励澳大利亚人购买私人医疗保险(PHI),并额外支付61亿澳元用于支付私立医院提供的服务费用。当所有澳大利亚人在医疗保险制度下都已享有免费保险时,政府为何要对一个私营行业提供巨额补贴呢?政府认为,更多人购买私人医疗保险将减轻公共系统的负担,并可能减少等待时间。然而,支持这一观点的证据并不充分。我们采用工具变量法来研究某地区私人医疗保险覆盖率提高对该地区公立医院等待时间的因果效应。所使用的工具是地区平均房价,它与平均收入和财富相关,因此由于税收激励措施会影响私人医疗保险的购买,但不会直接影响公立医院的等待时间。我们使用了维多利亚数据链接中心在患者层面上链接的2014 - 2018年医院入院和择期手术等待名单数据。这些数据涵盖了维多利亚州所有医院(包括公立医院和私立医院)的所有住院患者入院情况以及维多利亚州公立医院择期手术等待名单上登记的患者情况。我们发现,私人医疗保险覆盖率每提高一个百分点,公立医院的等待时间平均会减少约0.34天(或0.5%)。这种影响因外科专科和年龄组而异。然而,尽管这一效应具有统计学意义,但其实际意义有限,甚至可以忽略不计。这种微小的效应表明,旨在减轻公共系统压力而提高私人医疗保险覆盖率并非减少公立医院等待时间的有效策略。旨在提高公立医院效率和促进公平就医的替代政策应成为政策制定者的首要任务。