Patel Suhani S, Kim Jacqueline I, Stewart Darren E, Segev Dorry L, Massie Allan B
Department of Surgery, Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, MN.
Transplantation. 2024 Jun 1;108(6):1440-1447. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004929. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
Organs from Public Health Service criteria (PHSC) donors, previously referred to as PHS infectious-risk donors, have historically been recovered but not used, traditionally referred to as "discard," at higher rates despite negligible risk to recipients. On March 1, 2021, the definition of PHSC donors narrowed to include only the subset of donors deemed to have meaningfully elevated risk in the current era of improved infectious disease testing.
Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from May 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, we compared rates of PHSC classification and nonutilization of PHSC organs before versus after the March 1, 2021, policy change among recovered decedents using the χ 2 tests. We performed an adjusted interrupted time series analysis to examine kidney and liver recovery/nonuse (traditionally termed "discard") and kidney, liver, lung, and heart nonutilization (nonrecovery or recovery/nonuse) prepolicy versus postpolicy.
PHSC classification dropped sharply from 24.5% prepolicy to 15.4% postpolicy ( P < 0.001). Before the policy change, PHSC kidney recovery/nonuse, liver nonuse, lung nonuse, and heart nonuse were comparable to non-PHSC estimates (adjusted odds ratio: kidney = 0.98 1.06 1.14 , P = 0.14; liver = 0.85 0.92 1.01 , P = 0.07; lung = 0.91 0.99 1.08 , P = 0.83; heart = 0.89 0.97 1.05 , P = 0.47); following the policy change, PHSC kidney recovery/nonuse, liver nonuse, lung nonuse, and heart nonuse were lower than non-PHSC estimates (adjusted odds ratio: kidney = 0.77 0.84 0.91 , P < 0.001; liver = 0.77 0.84 0.92 , P < 0.001; lung = 0.74 0.81 0.90 , P < 0.001; heart = 0.61 0.67 0.73 , P < 0.001).
Even though PHSC donors under the new definition are a narrower and theoretically riskier subpopulation than under the previous classification, PHSC status appears to be associated with a reduced risk of kidney and liver recovery/nonuse and nonutilization of all organs. Although historically PHSC organs have been underused, our findings demonstrate a notable shift toward increased PHSC organ utilization.
公共卫生服务标准(PHSC)捐赠者的器官,以前被称为PHS感染风险捐赠者,历来虽对接受者风险可忽略不计,但被回收后未被使用的比例较高,传统上称为“丢弃”。2021年3月1日,PHSC捐赠者的定义缩小,仅包括在当前传染病检测改进时代被认为有显著更高风险的捐赠者子集。
利用移植受者科学登记处2019年5月1日至2022年12月31日的数据,我们使用χ²检验比较了2021年3月1日政策变更前后回收的死者中PHSC分类率和PHSC器官未使用情况。我们进行了调整后的中断时间序列分析,以检查肾脏和肝脏的回收/未使用情况(传统上称为“丢弃”)以及肾脏、肝脏、肺和心脏的未使用情况(未回收或回收/未使用)在政策实施前和实施后的情况。
PHSC分类从政策实施前的24.5%急剧降至政策实施后的15.4%(P < 0.001)。在政策变更前,PHSC肾脏回收/未使用、肝脏未使用、肺未使用和心脏未使用情况与非PHSC估计值相当(调整后的优势比:肾脏 = 0.98 1.06 1.14,P = 0.14;肝脏 = 0.85 0.92 1.01,P = 0.07;肺 = 0.91 0.99 1.08,P = 0.83;心脏 = 0.89 0.97 1.05,P = 0.47);政策变更后,PHSC肾脏回收/未使用、肝脏未使用、肺未使用和心脏未使用情况低于非PHSC估计值(调整后的优势比:肾脏 = 0.77 0.84 0.91,P < 0.001;肝脏 = 0.77 0.84 0.92,P < 0.001;肺 = 0.74 0.81 0.90,P < 0.001;心脏 = 0.61 0.67 0.73,P < 0.001)。
尽管新定义下的PHSC捐赠者比以前的分类范围更窄且理论上风险更高,但PHSC状态似乎与肾脏和肝脏回收/未使用以及所有器官未使用的风险降低有关。尽管历史上PHSC器官未得到充分利用,但我们的研究结果表明向增加PHSC器官利用率有显著转变。