Cho Jeong-Yeon, Jang Suk-Chan, Kang Dong-Won, Lee Eui-Kyung, Koh Hyein, Yoon Dok Hyun, Park Mi-Hai
School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Novartis, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;14:1282323. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1282323. eCollection 2024.
Approximately one-third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are refractory to treatment or experience relapse after initial therapy. Unfortunately, treatment options for older patients and those who experience relapse or become refractory to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are limited. This nationwide population-based study aimed to identify treatment patterns, survival times, and treatment costs in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL (R/R DLBCL).
Between 2011 and 2020, data on patients with R/R DLBCL were retrieved from the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, encompassing the entire population. We identified the treatment patterns for each treatment line using a Sankey diagram and calculated the median time to the subsequent treatment in line. Median overall and progression-free survival times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Finally, the medical costs incurred during DLBCL treatment were calculated for each treatment line and the costs related to HSCT were summarized at the episode level.
A total of 864 patients with R/R DLBCL who received second-line treatment were identified, and a regimen of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) was administered the most. Among them, 353 were refractory or relapsed cases that were treated with third-line treatments. The median times for second-line to third-line, third-line to fourth-line, fourth-line to fifth-line, and fifth-line to sixth-line treatment failures gradually decreased (3.93, 2.86, 1.81, and 1.38 months, respectively). The median overall survival time was 8.90 and 4.73 months following the second-line and third-line treatments, respectively. In the third-line treatment setting, the patients did not show a significant difference in survival time after HSCT. The median medical cost was $39,491 across all treatment lines including the cost of HSCT which was $22,054.
The treatment patterns in patients with R/R DLBCL, especially at third-line treatments and thereafter, were complicated, and their prognosis was poor despite the high medical costs. Novel and effective treatment options are expected to improve the prognosis and alleviate the economic burden of patients with R/R DLBCL.
大约三分之一的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者对治疗无效或在初始治疗后复发。不幸的是,老年患者以及那些对造血干细胞移植(HSCT)复发或难治的患者的治疗选择有限。这项基于全国人口的研究旨在确定复发/难治性DLBCL(R/R DLBCL)患者的治疗模式、生存时间和治疗成本。
2011年至2020年期间,从韩国健康保险审查与评估服务机构检索了涵盖全体人群的R/R DLBCL患者的数据。我们使用桑基图确定了每个治疗线的治疗模式,并计算了后续治疗线的中位时间。使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线估计中位总生存期和无进展生存期。最后,计算了DLBCL治疗期间各治疗线产生的医疗费用,并在事件层面总结了与HSCT相关的费用。
共确定了864例接受二线治疗的R/R DLBCL患者,其中异环磷酰胺、卡铂和依托泊苷(ICE)方案使用最为频繁。其中,353例为难治性或复发性病例,接受了三线治疗。二线至三线、三线至四线、四线至五线和五线至六线治疗失败的中位时间逐渐缩短(分别为3.93、2.86、1.81和1.38个月)。二线和三线治疗后的中位总生存期分别为8.90个月和4.73个月。在三线治疗中,HSCT后患者的生存时间无显著差异。包括HSCT费用(22,054美元)在内,所有治疗线的中位医疗费用为39,491美元。
R/R DLBCL患者的治疗模式,尤其是三线及以后的治疗模式复杂,尽管医疗费用高昂,但其预后较差。预计新的有效治疗选择将改善R/R DLBCL患者的预后并减轻其经济负担。