Thomson Sarah, Cylus Jonathan, Al Tayara Lynn, Martínez Marcos Gallardo, García-Ramírez Jorge Alejandro, Gregori María Serrano, Cerezo-Cerezo José, Karanikolos Marina, Evetovits Tamás
WHO Barcelona Office for Health Systems Financing, Barcelona, Spain.
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London, United Kingdom.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Dec 12;37:100826. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100826. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Ensuring that access to health care is affordable for everyone-financial protection-is central to universal health coverage (UHC). Financial protection is commonly measured using indicators of financial barriers to access (unmet need for health care) and financial hardship caused by out-of-pocket payments for health care (impoverishing and catastrophic health spending). We aim to assess financial hardship and unmet need in Europe and identify the coverage policy choices that undermine financial protection.
We carry out a cross-sectional study of financial hardship in 40 countries in Europe in 2019 (the latest available year of data before COVID-19) using microdata from national household budget surveys. We define impoverishing health spending as out-of-pocket payments that push households below or further below a relative poverty line and catastrophic health spending as out-of-pocket payments that exceed 40% of a household's capacity to pay for health care. We link these results to survey data on unmet need for health care, dental care, and prescribed medicines and information on two aspects of coverage policy at country level: the main basis for entitlement to publicly financed health care and user charges for covered services.
Out-of-pocket payments for health care lead to financial hardship and unmet need in every country in the study, particularly for people with low incomes. Impoverishing health spending ranges from under 1% of households (in six countries) to 12%, with a median of 3%. Catastrophic health spending ranges from under 1% of households (in two countries) to 20%, with a median of 6%. Catastrophic health spending is consistently concentrated in the poorest fifth of the population and is largely driven by out-of-pocket payments for outpatient medicines, medical products, and dental care-all forms of treatment that should be an essential part of primary care. The median incidence of catastrophic health spending is three times lower in countries that cover over 99% of the population than in countries that cover less than 99%. In 16 out of the 17 countries that cover less than 99% of the population, the basis for entitlement is payment of contributions to a social health insurance (SHI) scheme. Countries that give greater protection from user charges to people with low incomes have lower levels of catastrophic health spending.
It is challenging to identify with certainty the coverage policy choices that undermine financial protection due to the complexity of the policies involved and the difficulty of disentangling the effects of different choices. The conclusions we draw are therefore tentative, though plausible. Countries are more likely to move towards UHC if they reduce out-of-pocket payments in a progressive way, decreasing them for people with low incomes first. Coverage policy choices that seem likely to achieve this include de-linking entitlement from payment of SHI contributions; expanding the coverage of outpatient medicines, medical products, and dental care; limiting user charges; and strengthening protection against user charges, particularly for people with low incomes.
The European Union (DG SANTE and DG NEAR) and the Government of the Autonomous Community of Catalonia, Spain.
确保人人都能负担得起医疗保健——财务保护——是全民健康覆盖(UHC)的核心。财务保护通常使用获得医疗服务的财务障碍指标(未满足的医疗需求)以及医疗保健自付费用导致的财务困难(致贫性和灾难性医疗支出)来衡量。我们旨在评估欧洲的财务困难和未满足的需求,并确定破坏财务保护的覆盖政策选择。
我们利用国家家庭预算调查的微观数据,对2019年欧洲40个国家(新冠疫情之前可获取数据的最新年份)的财务困难情况进行了横断面研究。我们将致贫性医疗支出定义为使家庭低于或进一步低于相对贫困线的自付费用,将灾难性医疗支出定义为超过家庭医疗保健支付能力40%的自付费用。我们将这些结果与关于医疗保健、牙科护理和处方药未满足需求的调查数据以及国家层面覆盖政策两个方面的信息联系起来:公共融资医疗保健的权利主要依据以及覆盖服务的用户收费。
医疗保健自付费用在研究中的每个国家都会导致财务困难和未满足的需求,尤其是对低收入人群而言。致贫性医疗支出占家庭的比例从不到1%(六个国家)到12%不等,中位数为3%。灾难性医疗支出占家庭的比例从不到1%(两个国家)到20%不等,中位数为6%。灾难性医疗支出一直集中在最贫困的五分之一人口中,并且在很大程度上是由门诊药品、医疗产品和牙科护理的自付费用驱动的——所有这些治疗形式都应该是初级保健的重要组成部分。覆盖人口超过99%的国家中灾难性医疗支出的中位数发生率比覆盖人口不到99%的国家低三倍。在覆盖人口不到99%的17个国家中的16个国家,权利依据是向社会医疗保险(SHI)计划缴纳费用。对低收入人群给予更多用户收费保护的国家,灾难性医疗支出水平较低。
由于所涉及政策的复杂性以及难以区分不同选择的影响,确定破坏财务保护的覆盖政策选择具有挑战性。因此,我们得出的结论是初步的,尽管看似合理。如果各国以渐进的方式减少自付费用,首先降低低收入人群的自付费用,那么它们更有可能朝着全民健康覆盖迈进。似乎有可能实现这一目标的覆盖政策选择包括将权利与社会医疗保险缴费脱钩;扩大门诊药品、医疗产品和牙科护理的覆盖范围;限制用户收费;以及加强针对用户收费的保护,特别是对低收入人群。
欧盟(卫生与食品安全总司和近邻总司)以及西班牙加泰罗尼亚自治区政府。