Suppr超能文献

用于评定日本门诊中外显障碍的评定量表的心理计量学:ADHD 评定量表-5 和破坏性行为障碍评定量表。

Psychometrics of rating scales for externalizing disorders in Japanese outpatients: The ADHD-Rating Scale-5 and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale.

机构信息

Integrated and Advanced Medical Course, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Eiheiji, Japan.

Faculty of Nursing Science, Tsuruga Nursing University, Tsuruga, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024 Mar;33(1):e2015. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study validated the Japanese version of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) and the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale. We extended the ADHD-RS-5 by adding the oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder subscales to compare the two rating scales psychometrically.

METHODS

We examined the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion validity of the two rating scales in 135 Japanese outpatients aged 6-18 years.

RESULTS

The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good for all the subscales of the two rating scales except for the conduct disorder subscale of the ADHD-RS-5 extended. Good construct validity was revealed by expected correlational patterns between subscales from the two rating scales and the Children Behavior Checklist. The criterion validity was good for all the subscales of the two rating scales rated by parents, while teacher-ratings revealed substantially lower predictive ability for all the subscales. Agreement between parent- and teacher-ratings of the two rating scales was generally moderate and using predictive ratings alone of both ratings showed the best predictive ability among the integration methods examined.

CONCLUSION

The two rating scales have sound psychometric properties and will aid in screening and severity assessment of externalizing disorders in Japanese clinical settings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证日本版注意缺陷多动障碍评定量表-5(ADHD-RS-5)和破坏性行为障碍评定量表。我们通过添加对立违抗性障碍和品行障碍分量表来扩展 ADHD-RS-5,从而从心理测量学角度比较这两种评定量表。

方法

我们在 135 名年龄在 6-18 岁的日本门诊患者中,检验了这两种评定量表所有分量表的内部一致性、重测信度、结构效度和效标效度。

结果

除了 ADHD-RS-5 扩展后的品行障碍分量表外,两种评定量表所有分量表的内部一致性和重测信度均良好。两种评定量表的分量表之间存在预期的相关性,与儿童行为检查表的结果相符,表明具有良好的结构效度。两种评定量表的所有分量表在父母评定时均具有良好的效标效度,而教师评定时各分量表的预测能力均较低。两种评定量表的父母和教师评定之间的一致性通常为中等,在所检查的整合方法中,单独使用预测评定具有最佳的预测能力。

结论

这两种评定量表具有良好的心理测量学特性,将有助于日本临床环境中外显性行为障碍的筛查和严重程度评估。

相似文献

5

本文引用的文献

6
Prevalence of ADHD and Its Comorbidities in a Population-Based Sample.基于人群样本的 ADHD 患病率及其共病情况。
J Atten Disord. 2021 Jun;25(8):1058-1067. doi: 10.1177/1087054719886372. Epub 2019 Dec 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验