Suppr超能文献

腰椎手术后阿片类药物使用与患者报告结局指标的相关性。

Association between opioid utilization and patient-reported outcome measures following lumbar spine surgery.

机构信息

University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

University of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2024 Jul;24(7):1183-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Feb 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), created by the National institute of Health, is a reliable and valid survey for patients with lumbar spine pathology. Preoperative opioid use has been shown to be an important predictor variable of self-reported health status in legacy patient-reported outcome measures.

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of chronic preoperative opiate use on PROMIS survey scores.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Between March 2019 and November 2021, 227 patients underwent lumbar decompression ± ≤ 2 level fusion. Fifty-seven patients (25.11%) had chronic preoperative opioid use.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Oswestry disability index (ODI) and PROMIS survey scores.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single center patient-reported outcome database was performed with a minimum of 2 year follow-up. PROMIS Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), Sleep disturbance (SD), and Social Roles (SR) surveys were recorded at preoperative intake with subsequent follow-up at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients were grouped into chronic opioid users as defined by >6-month duration of use. Differences in mean survey scores were evaluated using Welch t-tests.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-seven patients met our inclusion criteria of completed PROMIS surveys at the designated timepoints. A total of 57 (25.11%) were chronic opioid users (COU) prior to surgery. Analysis of patient-reported health outcomes shows that long term opioid use correlated with worse ODI and PROMIS scores at baseline compared to nonchronic users (NOU). At 1 and 2 year follow-up, the COU cohort continued to have significantly worse ODI, PROMIS Fatigue, PF, PI, SD, and SR scores. There is a statistical difference in the magnitude of change in health status between the 2 cohorts at 1 year follow-up in PROMIS Depression (-5.04±7.88 vs -2.49±8.73, p=.042), PF (6.25±7.11 vs 9.03±9.04, p=.019), and PI (-7.40±7.37 vs -10.58±9.87, p=.011) and 2 year follow-up in PROMIS PF (5.58±6.84 vs 7.99±9.64, p=.041) and PI (-6.71±8.32 vs -9.62±10.06, p=.032). Mean improvement in PROMIS scores for the COU cohort at 2 year follow-up exceeded minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in all domains except PROMIS Depression, SR and SD.

CONCLUSION

Patients with chronic opioid use status have worse baseline PROMIS scores compared with patients who had nonchronic use. However, patients in the COU cohort displayed clinically significant postoperative improvement in multiple PROMIS domains. These results show that patients with chronic opioid use can benefit greatly from surgical intervention and will allow physicians to better set expectations with their patients.

摘要

背景

由美国国立卫生研究院创建的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)是一种针对腰椎病理患者的可靠且有效的调查工具。研究表明,术前使用阿片类药物是传统患者报告结局测量中自我报告健康状况的一个重要预测变量。

目的

研究慢性术前阿片类药物使用对 PROMIS 调查评分的影响。

研究设计

回顾性数据库分析。

患者样本

2019 年 3 月至 2021 年 11 月期间,227 例患者接受了腰椎减压术±≤2 个节段融合术。57 例患者(25.11%)有慢性术前阿片类药物使用史。

结局测量

Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和 PROMIS 调查评分。

方法

对前瞻性维护的单中心患者报告结局数据库进行回顾性分析,随访时间至少 2 年。术前摄入时记录 PROMIS 焦虑、抑郁、疲劳、疼痛干扰(PI)、躯体功能(PF)、睡眠障碍(SD)和社会角色(SR)调查,随后在术后 6、12 和 24 个月进行随访。根据>6 个月的使用时间,将患者分为慢性阿片类药物使用者(COU)。使用 Welch t 检验评估平均调查评分的差异。

结果

227 例患者符合完成指定时间点 PROMIS 调查的纳入标准。共有 57 例(25.11%)患者在手术前为慢性阿片类药物使用者(COU)。对患者报告的健康结果进行分析表明,与非慢性使用者(NOU)相比,长期使用阿片类药物与基线时更差的 ODI 和 PROMIS 评分相关。在 1 年和 2 年随访时,COU 组的 ODI、PROMIS 疲劳、PF、PI、SD 和 SR 评分持续显著更差。在 1 年随访时,COU 组在 PROMIS 抑郁(-5.04±7.88 与-2.49±8.73,p=.042)、PF(6.25±7.11 与 9.03±9.04,p=.019)和 PI(-7.40±7.37 与-10.58±9.87,p=.011)方面的健康状况变化程度存在统计学差异,在 2 年随访时,在 PF(5.58±6.84 与 7.99±9.64,p=.041)和 PI(6.71±8.32 与-9.62±10.06,p=.032)方面也存在统计学差异。COU 组在 2 年随访时的 PROMIS 评分平均改善超过了所有领域的最小临床重要差异(MCID),除了 PROMIS 抑郁、SR 和 SD。

结论

与非慢性使用者相比,慢性阿片类药物使用者的基线 PROMIS 评分更差。然而,COU 组的患者在多个 PROMIS 领域显示出了有临床意义的术后改善。这些结果表明,慢性阿片类药物使用者可以从手术干预中获益匪浅,这将使医生能够更好地与患者建立预期。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验