• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当前对早期宫颈癌微创治疗的生存意义进行的分析。

Current analysis of the survival implications for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of early-stage cervix cancer.

机构信息

Women's Cancer Research Foundation, 699 Diamond Street, Laguna Beach, CA, 92651, USA.

Oso Home Care, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 17;18(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01832-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-01832-x
PMID:38366169
Abstract

Early-stage cervical cancer (ESCC) is managed with radical hysterectomy, a procedure that can be performed either via open surgery or minimally invasive surgery (MIS), the latter of which is accomplished via traditional laparoscopy or robotic-assisted surgery. Previously, MIS was routinely incorporated into the management of ESCC due to the approach's reduced operative morbidity and truncated hospital stay duration, but more recent clinical evidence has since impugned the efficacy of MIS because of the reportedly inferior disease-free survival and overall survival outcomes compared to open surgery. However, additional studies have documented equivalent outcomes among the various surgical modalities, suggesting further exploration of clinical factors as we endeavor to conclusively determine the standard of care for patients diagnosed with ESCC.

摘要

早期宫颈癌(ESCC)采用根治性子宫切除术进行治疗,该手术可以通过开放性手术或微创手术(MIS)完成,后者通过传统腹腔镜或机器人辅助手术完成。此前,由于 MIS 手术的手术发病率降低和住院时间缩短,因此常规将 MIS 纳入 ESCC 的治疗中,但最近的临床证据质疑了 MIS 的疗效,因为与开放性手术相比, MIS 的无病生存率和总生存率较低。然而,其他研究已经证明了各种手术方式之间的结果相当,这表明在我们努力确定 ESCC 患者的护理标准时,需要进一步探讨临床因素。

相似文献

1
Current analysis of the survival implications for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of early-stage cervix cancer.当前对早期宫颈癌微创治疗的生存意义进行的分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 17;18(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01832-x.
2
Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.微创外科手术与剖腹手术治疗早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的比较:生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):591-597. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.038. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.手术方式对宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术患者肿瘤学结局的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):619.e1-619.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
4
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.2018 年 FIGO 分期中微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的结局比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
5
Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.早期宫颈癌的微创根治性子宫切除术:早期经验期的量效关系。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):390-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 27.
6
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.与剖腹手术相比,宫颈癌的微创根治性子宫切除术与发病率降低和相似的生存结果相关。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):402-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;19(18):11641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811641.
8
Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.学习曲线可能会影响宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的肿瘤学结果。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 25.
9
Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review.微创根治性子宫切除术与避免早期宫颈癌癌细胞播散的重要性:一篇叙述性综述。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jan;34(1):e5. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e5. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
10
The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.MEMORY 研究:早期宫颈癌微创根治性手术与开放性根治性子宫切除术的多中心研究:生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Sep;166(3):417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator or vaginal tube use.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术,无需使用子宫操纵器或阴道管。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Sep;34(5):e63. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e63. Epub 2023 May 1.
2
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
3
Influence of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in minimally invasive surgery of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫操作器对子宫内膜癌微创手术中肿瘤学结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;48(10):2112-2118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.034. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
The Relationship Between Parametrial Involvement and Parametrial Tissue Removed in Radical Surgery in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌根治术中宫旁受累与切除宫旁组织的关系
World J Oncol. 2022 Apr;13(2):59-68. doi: 10.14740/wjon1439. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
5
Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for Minimal Invasive Surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助阴道根治性子宫切除术作为早期宫颈癌微创手术的一种安全选择:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jul;166(1):188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer in Light of the LACC Trial: What Have We Learned?基于 LACC 试验对宫颈癌的微创外科治疗:我们学到了什么?
Curr Oncol. 2022 Feb 14;29(2):1093-1106. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020093.
7
Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States.美国宫颈癌微创手术使用率下降。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jul;162(1):43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 13.
8
Sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: time to move forward.宫颈癌前哨淋巴结:是时候向前推进了。
Chin Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr;10(2):18. doi: 10.21037/cco-21-5.
9
Survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer treated with open versus robotic radical hysterectomy: Our surgical pathology interrogation.开腹与机器人根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌患者的生存结局:我们的外科病理学探讨。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Nov;159(2):373-380. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
10
SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.SUCCOR 研究:一项国际欧洲队列观察性研究,比较了微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗 IB1 期宫颈癌患者的效果。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1269-1277. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506. Epub 2020 Aug 11.