Suppr超能文献

有声和无声青蛙的听觉敏感性与鼓室中耳

Auditory sensitivity and tympanic middle ear in a vocal and a non-vocal frog.

作者信息

Zhao Longhui, Zhang Meihua, Qin Yuanyu, Wang Tongliang, Zhai Xiaofei, Cui Jianguo, Wang Jichao

机构信息

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, Key Laboratory of Tropical Animal and Plant Ecology of Hainan Province, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, PR China.

CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, PR China.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2024 Mar 15;444:108970. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108970. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

Abstract

The tympanic middle ear is important for anuran hearing on land. However, many species have partly or entirely lost their tympanic apparatus. Previous studies have compared hearing sensitivities in species that possess and lack tympanic membranes capable of sound production and acoustic communication. However, little is known about how these hearing abilities are comparable to those of mutant species. Here, we compared the eardrum and middle ear anatomies of two sympatric sibling species from a noisy stream habitat, namely the "non-vocal" Hainan torrent frog (Amolops hainanensis) and the "vocal" little torrent frog (Amolops torrentis), the latter of which is capable of acoustic communication. Our results showed that the relative (to head size) eardrum diameter of A. hainanensis was smaller than that of A. torrentis, although the absolute size was not smaller. Unlike A. torrentis, the tympanic membrane area of A. hainanensis was not clearly differentiated from the surrounding skin. The middle ear, however, was well-developed in both species. We measured the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) of A. hainanensis and compared the ABR thresholds and latencies to those previously obtained for A. torrentis. Our results suggested that these two species exhibited significant differences in hearing sensitivity. A. hainanensis (smaller relative eardrum, nonvocal) had higher ABR thresholds and longer initial response times than A. torrentis (larger relative eardrum, vocal) at lower frequencies. Neurophysiological responses from the brain were obtained for tone pips between 800 Hz and 7,000 Hz, with peak sensitivities found at 3,000 Hz (73 dB SPL) for A. hainanensis, and at 1,800 Hz (61 dB SPL) for A. torrentis. Our results suggest that the non-vocal A. hainanensis has lower hearing sensitivity than its vocal sister species (i.e., A. torrentis), which may be related to differences in tympanic or inner ear structure and morphology.

摘要

鼓室中耳对无尾目动物在陆地上的听力很重要。然而,许多物种已经部分或完全失去了它们的鼓膜装置。以前的研究比较了具有和不具有能够发声和进行声学交流的鼓膜的物种的听力敏感度。然而,对于这些听力能力如何与突变物种的听力能力相比较,人们知之甚少。在这里,我们比较了来自嘈杂溪流栖息地的两个同域姊妹物种的鼓膜和中耳解剖结构,即“不发声”的海南湍蛙(海南湍蛙)和“发声”的小湍蛙(小湍蛙),后者能够进行声学交流。我们的结果表明,海南湍蛙的相对(相对于头部大小)鼓膜直径比小湍蛙小,尽管绝对大小并不小。与小湍蛙不同,海南湍蛙的鼓膜面积与周围皮肤没有明显区分。然而,两个物种的中耳都发育良好。我们测量了海南湍蛙的听觉脑干反应(ABR),并将ABR阈值和潜伏期与之前从小湍蛙获得的结果进行了比较。我们的结果表明,这两个物种在听力敏感度上表现出显著差异。在较低频率下,海南湍蛙(相对鼓膜较小,不发声)的ABR阈值较高,初始反应时间比小湍蛙(相对鼓膜较大,发声)长。在800赫兹至7000赫兹之间的短纯音获得了来自大脑的神经生理反应,海南湍蛙在3000赫兹(73分贝声压级)时发现峰值敏感度,小湍蛙在1800赫兹(61分贝声压级)时发现峰值敏感度。我们的结果表明,不发声的海南湍蛙的听力敏感度低于其发声的姊妹物种(即小湍蛙),这可能与鼓膜或内耳结构和形态的差异有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验