Shah Eric D, Curley Michael A, Patel Amit, Lo Wai-Kit, Chan Walter W
Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Feb;23(2):263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.049. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
Heartburn symptoms contribute to healthcare-seeking among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Despite clinical guidance, management is often dictated by insurance restrictions. Several potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) are under development as a new class of therapy. We performed economic analyses to align GERD drug development with the needs of gastroenterologists, insurers and patients in a value-based environment.
A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare vonoprazan 20 mg daily (an example of a PCAB), common over-the-counter or prescription proton pump inhibitor regimens, and no treatment over a 1-year time horizon. Clinical responses were evaluated based on the proportions of heartburn-free days in a recent phase 3 multicenter trial. Healthcare utilization for persistent reflux symptoms was derived from national observational studies compared with healthy control subjects. Costs and quality-adjusted life years were reported.
Without insurance coverage for appropriate therapy, patients spend $4443 and insurers spend $3784 on average per year for inadequately treated GERD symptoms. Our model estimates that PCABs could save at least $3000 in annual costs to patients and insurers, could generate quality-adjusted life year gains (+0.06 per year), and could be cost-saving to insurers as a covered option at a price up to $8.57 per pill, if these drugs are able to demonstrate similar effectiveness to proton pump inhibitors in future trials evaluating heartburn relief and erosive esophagitis healing to regulators. Threshold prices reflect pricing after all pharmacy benefits manager rebates and discounts.
We demonstrate that aiming GERD-related drug development toward heartburn relief appears critical to align cost-effective incentives for industry and insurers with those of patients and gastroenterologists.
烧心症状促使胃食管反流病(GERD)患者寻求医疗帮助。尽管有临床指南,但治疗方案往往受保险限制的影响。几种钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂(PCABs)正在作为一类新的治疗方法进行研发。我们进行了经济分析,以使GERD药物研发在基于价值的环境中符合胃肠病学家、保险公司和患者的需求。
构建了一个决策分析模型,以比较每日20毫克沃克帕唑(一种PCAB的示例)、常见的非处方或处方质子泵抑制剂治疗方案以及1年内不进行治疗的效果。根据最近一项3期多中心试验中无烧心天数的比例评估临床反应。与健康对照受试者相比,从全国观察性研究中得出持续性反流症状的医疗资源利用情况。报告了成本和质量调整生命年。
如果没有适当治疗的保险覆盖,患者每年因GERD症状治疗不充分平均花费4443美元,保险公司平均花费3784美元。我们的模型估计,如果这些药物在未来评估烧心缓解和糜烂性食管炎愈合的试验中能够向监管机构证明与质子泵抑制剂具有相似的有效性,那么PCABs每年可为患者和保险公司节省至少3000美元的成本,可使质量调整生命年增加(每年增加0.06),并且作为一种保险覆盖的选择,每片价格高达8.57美元时对保险公司而言可能具有成本效益。阈值价格反映了所有药房福利管理机构的回扣和折扣后的定价。
我们证明,使GERD相关药物研发以缓解烧心为目标,对于使行业和保险公司的成本效益激励与患者和胃肠病学家的激励保持一致似乎至关重要。