Marcer G, Bizzotto R, Bartolucci G B, Saia B O
G Ital Med Lav. 1985 Mar-May;7(2-3):75-80.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the most common hearing damage criteria, based upon pure tone audiometric data. We examined 1086 workers with different intensity and duration of noise exposure. After consecutive selections, 455 subjects, subdivided into four exposure groups, were studied. The 12 considered criteria showed a widespread difference in their sensitivity: the percentage of hearing impaired subjects ranged from 3.3 to 24.2% in the whole population. The most sensitive criteria evaluated the hearing loss at 2 and 4 KHz. The evaluation of the hearing loss at 3 and 6 KHz did not modify the percentage of subjects bearing an handicap. The authors suggest the average hearing loss at 2 and 4 KHz as a criterion to be used for preventing and epidemiological purposes.
本研究的目的是基于纯音听力测定数据比较最常见的听力损伤标准。我们检查了1086名有不同强度和时长噪声暴露的工人。经过连续筛选,研究了455名受试者,他们被分为四个暴露组。所考虑的12项标准在敏感性方面存在广泛差异:在整个人口中,听力受损受试者的百分比在3.3%至24.2%之间。最敏感的标准评估的是2千赫兹和4千赫兹时的听力损失。对3千赫兹和6千赫兹时听力损失的评估并未改变有听力障碍受试者的百分比。作者建议将2千赫兹和4千赫兹时的平均听力损失作为用于预防和流行病学目的的标准。