Suppr超能文献

[无可用内容]。

[Not Available].

作者信息

Ben Rabeh Rania, Mazigh Sonia, Missaoui Nada, Atitallah Sofien, Yahayoui Salem, Boukthir Samir

机构信息

University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis.

Child Medicine Department C, Béchir Hamza Children's Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.

出版信息

Tunis Med. 2023 May 5;101(5):469-474.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical reasoning (CR) is a core skill taught by medical schools. Clinical reasoning learning sessions (CRL) during hospital internship of externals in pediatrics was recently introduced in Faculty of Medicine of Tunis.

AIM

To compare a case based self-directed learning (CBSDL) tool with CRL sessions in two groups of the students assigned to pediatric internship.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial with draw of two groups: CRL group (students who attended the CRL session) and SDL group (students who received the CBSDL tool). Main judgment criterion was the final score obtained by the student at the test of sequential management problem (SMP). A docimological analysis of SMP test was performed.

RESULTS

The mean final score in CRL group and SDL group was 12.03±1.44 and 14.05±1.64, respectively (p <0.001). The scores obtained at the different steps of SMP test were significantly higher in SDL group. The difficulty p and discrimination D indices of the SPM test were 0.65 and 0.21, respectively. The agreement between the two correctors was very good since the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.977. We analyzed the reliability of the test by measuring Cronbach's α coefficient which was 0.955.

CONCLUSION

CBSDL tool has allowed students to learn hypothetico-deductive reasoning. However, this tool must be supplemented by direct supervision at hospital internship to support CR.

摘要

引言

临床推理(CR)是医学院校教授的一项核心技能。突尼斯医学院最近在儿科实习期间为外部实习生引入了临床推理学习课程(CRL)。

目的

比较两组分配到儿科实习的学生中基于案例的自主学习(CBSDL)工具与CRL课程的效果。

方法

我们进行了一项随机试验,随机抽取两组:CRL组(参加CRL课程的学生)和SDL组(接受CBSDL工具的学生)。主要判断标准是学生在顺序管理问题测试(SMP)中的最终得分。对SMP测试进行了评价分析。

结果

CRL组和SDL组的平均最终得分分别为12.03±1.44和14.05±1.64(p<0.001)。SDL组在SMP测试不同步骤中获得的分数显著更高。SPM测试的难度p指数和区分度D指数分别为0.65和0.21。两位评分者之间的一致性非常好,因为组内相关系数为0.977。我们通过测量Cronbach's α系数分析了测试的可靠性,该系数为0.955。

结论

CBSDL工具使学生能够学习假设演绎推理。然而,该工具必须辅以医院实习期间的直接监督,以支持临床推理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc86/11361299/14120c10c53f/capture1.jpg

相似文献

1
[Not Available].
Tunis Med. 2023 May 5;101(5):469-474.
4
Self-directed learning readiness of Indian medical students: a mixed method study.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jun 8;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1244-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-directed Learning: a New Look at an Old Concept.
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Oct 20;31(1):229-230. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01121-w. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
[How to formalise the supervision of learning of clinical reasoning].
Rev Med Interne. 2020 Aug;41(8):529-535. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2020.04.014. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
4
Implementation and evaluation of a self-directed learning activity for first-year medical students.
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1717780. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1717780.
5
Assessing Clinical Reasoning: Targeting the Higher Levels of the Pyramid.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1631-1636. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04953-4.
6
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
8
Challenges and opportunities facing medical education.
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2011;122:48-58.
10
The effectiveness of self-directed learning in health professions education: a systematic review.
Med Educ. 2010 Nov;44(11):1057-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03750.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验