Departments of Ultrasound.
Anorectal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Ultrasound Q. 2024 Jun 1;40(2):98-103. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000676.
The objective of this academic research is to assess the efficacy of conventional endorectal ultrasound (ERUS), ultrasonic shear wave elastography (SWE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant therapy (nCRT). Forty-five patients with advanced low rectal cancer (T ≥ 3) were included. Before and after nCRT, ERUS, SWE, and MRI evaluations were conducted. The T staging of ultrasound (uT) and MRI (mT) were evaluated and compared with the pathological T staging (ypT). The accuracy of the 2 diagnostic methods for T staging, and T downstaging was evaluated. The ultrasound elasticity difference and relative elasticity before and after treatment and pathological T downstaging were compared, and its cutoff value and the area under the curve were assessed. In terms of T staging accuracy after chemoradiotherapy, the values for ERUS, ERUS combined with SWE, and MRI were 64.4%, 71.1%, and 62.2%, respectively. No significant difference was observed among these groups ( P > 0.05). The accuracy of uT downstaging was 84.4%, and that of mT downstaging was 88.9%. The receiver operating characteristic curve of uLD and elastic differences and relative elasticity of T downstaging after treatment were 0.754, 0.817, and 0.886, respectively (all P < 0.05). Both ERUS and MRI can evaluate ypT downstaging. The indicators for evaluating T downstaging are uLD, elasticity difference, and relative elasticity, providing more reference for clinical assessment of nCRT efficacy.
本学术研究的目的是评估传统经直肠超声(ERUS)、超声剪切波弹性成像(SWE)和磁共振成像(MRI)技术在评估新辅助治疗(nCRT)效果中的作用。共纳入 45 例进展期低位直肠癌(T≥3)患者。在 nCRT 前后分别进行 ERUS、SWE 和 MRI 评估。评估超声(uT)和 MRI(mT)的 T 分期,并与病理 T 分期(ypT)进行比较。评估 2 种诊断方法对 T 分期和 T 降级的准确性。比较治疗前后超声弹性差异和相对弹性,评估其截断值和曲线下面积。在放化疗后 T 分期准确性方面,ERUS、ERUS 联合 SWE 和 MRI 的准确率分别为 64.4%、71.1%和 62.2%。这些组之间没有显著差异(P>0.05)。uT 降级的准确率为 84.4%,mT 降级的准确率为 88.9%。治疗后 uLD 和 T 降级的弹性差异及相对弹性的受试者工作特征曲线分别为 0.754、0.817 和 0.886(均 P<0.05)。ERUS 和 MRI 均可评估 ypT 降级。评估 T 降级的指标为 uLD、弹性差异和相对弹性,为 nCRT 疗效的临床评估提供了更多参考。