State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 5;58(9):4247-4256. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c08339. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
Nitrous acid (HONO) is an important source of hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the atmosphere. Precise determination of the absolute ultraviolet (UV) absorption cross section of gaseous HONO lays the basis for the accurate measurement of its concentration by optical methods and the estimation of HONO loss rate through photolysis. In this study, we performed a series of laboratory and field intercomparison experiments for HONO measurement between striping coil-liquid waveguide capillary cell (SC-LWCC) photometry and incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (IBBCEAS). Specified HONO concentrations prepared by an ultrapure standard HONO source were utilized for laboratory intercomparisons. Results show a consistent ∼22% negative bias in measurements of the IBBCEAS compared with a SC-LWCC photometer. It is confirmed that the discrepancies occurring between these techniques are associated with the overestimation of the absolute UV absorption cross sections through careful analysis of possible uncertainties. We quantified the absorption cross section of gaseous HONO (360-390 nm) utilizing a custom-built IBBCEAS instrument, and the results were found to be 22-34% lower than the previously published absorption cross sections widely used in HONO concentration retrieval and atmospheric chemical transport models (CTMs). This suggests that the HONO concentrations retrieved by optical methods based on absolute absorption cross sections may have been underestimated by over 20%. Plus, the daytime loss rate and unidentified sources of HONO may also have evidently been overestimated in pre-existing studies. In summary, our findings underscore the significance of revisiting the absolute absorption cross section of HONO and the re-evaluation of the previously reported HONO budgets.
亚硝酸(HONO)是大气中羟基自由基(OH)的重要来源。准确测定气态 HONO 的绝对紫外(UV)吸收截面,为光学方法准确测量其浓度和通过光解估算 HONO 损失率奠定了基础。在这项研究中,我们进行了一系列实验室和现场实验,比较了条纹盘管-液波导毛细管池(SC-LWCC)光度计和非相干宽带腔增强吸收光谱(IBBCEAS)测量 HONO 的方法。利用超纯标准 HONO 源制备的指定 HONO 浓度进行了实验室比较。结果表明,与 SC-LWCC 光度计相比,IBBCEAS 的测量值存在约 22%的一致负偏差。通过仔细分析可能存在的不确定因素,证实了这两种技术之间的差异与绝对 UV 吸收截面的高估有关。我们利用定制的 IBBCEAS 仪器量化了气态 HONO(360-390nm)的吸收截面,结果发现,与广泛用于 HONO 浓度反演和大气化学输送模型(CTMs)的先前公布的吸收截面相比,吸收截面低 22-34%。这表明基于绝对吸收截面的光学方法反演的 HONO 浓度可能被低估了 20%以上。此外,在先前的研究中,HONO 的日间损失率和未识别的来源也可能被明显高估。总之,我们的研究结果强调了重新审视 HONO 的绝对吸收截面以及重新评估先前报告的 HONO 预算的重要性。