Yazdi Hamidreza, Eslami Arvin, Torkaman Ali, Elahifar Omid, Kasaeian Amir, Alimoghadam Shaya, Alimoghadam Rojina, Abolghasemian Mansour
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics; Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine; Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center (FCRDC), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Digestive Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute; Research Center for Chronic Inflammatory Diseases; Clinical Research Development Unit, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 19;25(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07282-8.
The optimal agent for thromboprophylaxis following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains unclear, particularly in patients with a low baseline risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of aspirin versus low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in this specific patient population.
We analyzed data from patients who underwent ACLR between March 2016 and March 2021, focusing on those with a low risk for VTE. High-risk individuals, identified by factors such as cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, previous VTE, inflammatory bowel disease, active cancer, and a BMI > 40, were excluded (n = 33). Our approach included a thorough review of medical charts, surgical reports, and pre-operative assessments, complemented by telephone follow-up conducted over a 3-month period by a single investigator. We assessed the incidence of symptomatic VTE, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism, as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included to complications related to the surgery and thromboprophylaxis. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, univariate logistic regression models, and calculations of incidence rates.
In our study, 761 patients (761 knees) were included, with 458 (60.18%) receiving aspirin and 303 (39.82%) receiving LMWH. The two groups showed no significant differences in demographic factors except for age. The incidence of VTE was reported at 1.31% (10 individuals). Specifically, five patients in the aspirin group (1.09%) and five patients in the LMWH group (1.65%) developed a symptomatic VTE event (p = 0.53). Additionally, the two groups did not significantly differ in terms of other complications, such as hemarthrosis or surgical site infection (p > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in VTE risk between the two groups.
This study, focusing on isolated ACLR in patients with a low baseline risk for venous thromboembolism, demonstrated that aspirin is equally effective as low molecular weight heparins for VTE prophylaxis following this surgery.
III.
关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后预防血栓形成的最佳药物仍不明确,尤其是在静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)基线风险较低的患者中。这项回顾性队列研究旨在比较阿司匹林与低分子量肝素(LMWHs)在这一特定患者群体中的有效性和安全性。
我们分析了2016年3月至2021年3月期间接受ACLR的患者数据,重点关注VTE低风险患者。排除了因心脏病、肺病、糖尿病、既往VTE、炎症性肠病、活动性癌症和BMI>40等因素确定的高风险个体(n = 33)。我们的方法包括全面审查病历、手术报告和术前评估,并由一名研究人员在3个月内进行电话随访作为补充。我们将有症状的VTE(包括深静脉血栓形成和肺血栓栓塞)的发生率作为主要结局进行评估。次要结局包括与手术和血栓预防相关的并发症。统计分析包括描述性统计、单变量逻辑回归模型和发病率计算。
在我们的研究中,纳入了761例患者(761膝),其中458例(60.18%)接受阿司匹林治疗,303例(39.82%)接受LMWH治疗。除年龄外,两组在人口统计学因素上无显著差异。VTE的发生率报告为1.31%(10人)。具体而言,阿司匹林组有5例患者(1.09%)和LMWH组有5例患者(1.65%)发生了有症状的VTE事件(p = 0.53)。此外,两组在其他并发症方面,如关节积血或手术部位感染,也无显著差异(p>0.05)。逻辑回归分析显示两组之间的VTE风险无统计学显著差异。
这项针对静脉血栓栓塞症基线风险较低的患者进行孤立ACLR的研究表明,阿司匹林在该手术后预防VTE方面与低分子量肝素同样有效。
III级。