Sokolowski Katie, Turner Patricia V, Lewis Elise, Wange Ronald L, Fortin Marie C
Safety Assessment, Development Sciences, Denali Therapeutics Inc, South San Francisco, California 94080, USA.
Global Animal Welfare & Training, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887, USA.
Toxicol Sci. 2024 Apr 29;199(1):29-39. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae022.
To avoid adverse events in humans, toxicity studies in nonclinical species have been the foundation of safety evaluation in the pharmaceutical industry. However, it is recognized that working with animals in research is a privilege, and conscientious use should always respect the 3Rs: replacement, reduction, and refinement. In the wake of the shortages in routine nonrodent species and considering that nonanimal methods are not yet sufficiently mature, the value of the rabbit as a nonrodent species is worth exploring. Historically used in vaccine, cosmetic, and medical device testing, the rabbit is seldom used today as a second species in pharmaceutical development, except for embryo-fetal development studies, ophthalmic therapeutics, some medical devices and implants, and vaccines. Although several factors affect the decision of species selection, including pharmacological relevance, pharmacokinetics, and ADME considerations, there are no perfect animal models. In this forum article, we bring together experts from veterinary medicine, industry, contract research organizations, and government to explore the pros and cons, residual concerns, and data gaps regarding the use of the rabbit for general toxicity testing.
为避免在人体中出现不良事件,非临床物种的毒性研究一直是制药行业安全性评估的基础。然而,人们认识到在研究中使用动物是一种特权,并且谨慎使用应始终遵循3R原则:替代、减少和优化。鉴于常规非啮齿类物种短缺,且考虑到非动物方法尚未足够成熟,兔子作为非啮齿类物种的价值值得探索。兔子历史上曾用于疫苗、化妆品和医疗器械测试,如今在药物研发中很少作为第二种物种使用,除了胚胎-胎儿发育研究、眼科治疗、一些医疗器械和植入物以及疫苗。尽管有几个因素会影响物种选择的决策,包括药理学相关性、药代动力学和药物吸收、分布、代谢及排泄方面的考虑,但不存在完美的动物模型。在这篇论坛文章中,我们汇聚了来自兽医学、行业、合同研究组织和政府的专家,以探讨将兔子用于一般毒性测试的利弊、尚存的担忧以及数据空白。