Suppr超能文献

儿童和青少年致龋性饮食评估与分析工具:一项系统评价

Cariogenic Diet Assessment and Analysis Tools in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Angelopoulou Matina V, Seremidi Kyriaki, Benetou Vasiliki, Agouropoulos Andreas, Rahiotis Christos, Gizani Sotiria

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Feb 20;22:93-106. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b4997015.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To collect and evaluate the available evidence on existing tools used in research and clinical practice to assess and analyse the diet of children and adolescents for its cariogenicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple databases were searched up to October 2022, with no date, publication, or language restrictions, followed by a manual search. Study screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. Dietary assessment tools and dental clinical parameters tested were retrieved for qualitative assessment and synthesis.

RESULTS

Of the 2896 papers identified, 9 cohort and 23 cross-sectional studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. To assess dietary data, 13 studies used a 24-h recall, 11 used a food diary, and 7 used a food frequency questionnaire. For analysis, five studies reported using the Healthy Eating Index, ten used a score based on consumption of sugars, and the remaining analysed cariogenic diet based on the weight and frequency of sugars consumed, or the daily caloric intake from free sugars. Risk of bias assessment suggested that 65.7% of the studies were of moderate and 31.5% of high quality.

CONCLUSION

Inconsistency exists regarding methods used for the assessment and analysis of dietary cariogenicity. Although every dietary assessment tool has different strengths and limitations, the 24-h recall was the most commonly used method for the assessment of dietary cariogenicity and the most consistent in detecting a positive relationship between sugary diet and carious lesions. A standardised method for cariogenic analysis of dietary data needs to be determined.

摘要

目的

收集并评估研究和临床实践中用于评估和分析儿童及青少年饮食致龋性的现有工具的可用证据。

材料与方法

检索了多个数据库直至2022年10月,无日期、出版物或语言限制,随后进行了手动检索。研究筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估均重复进行。检索了所测试的饮食评估工具和牙科临床参数以进行定性评估和综合分析。

结果

在识别出的2896篇论文中,9项队列研究和23项横断面研究符合纳入标准。为评估饮食数据,13项研究使用了24小时回忆法,11项使用了食物日记,7项使用了食物频率问卷。在分析方面,5项研究报告使用了健康饮食指数,10项使用了基于糖摄入量的评分,其余研究则根据糖的摄入量和频率或游离糖的每日热量摄入来分析致龋饮食。偏倚风险评估表明,65.7%的研究质量中等,31.5%的研究质量高。

结论

在饮食致龋性评估和分析方法上存在不一致。尽管每种饮食评估工具都有不同的优势和局限性,但24小时回忆法是评估饮食致龋性最常用的方法,并且在检测含糖饮食与龋损之间的正相关关系方面最为一致。需要确定一种饮食数据致龋性分析的标准化方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a23/11619880/a8c2a507bd1f/ohpd-22-93-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验