Center for Alcohol and Drug Research (KORFOR), Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05600-x.
BACKGROUND: The association between polysubstance use disorder (pSUD), mental illness, and cognitive impairments is well established and linked to negative outcomes in substance use disorder treatment. However, it remains unclear whether cognitive impairment predicts long-term psychological distress among treatment seeking patients with pSUD. This study aimed to investigate the associations and predictive ability of cognitive impairment on psychological distress one and 5 years after treatment initiation. METHODS: N = 164 treatment seeking patients with pSUD were sampled at treatment initiation. We examined associations between cognitive impairment according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI), and Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult version (BRIEF-A) administered at treatment initiation and psychological distress defined by the Symptom Check List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) at treatment initiation, one and five years later. We ran hierarchical logistic regressions to assess the predictive ability of the respective cognitive instruments administered at treatment initiation on psychological distress measured one and five years later including psychological distress at treatment initiation and substance intake at the time-points of the measurements as covariates. RESULTS: The main results was that MoCA and BRIEF-A predicted psychological distress at years one and five, but BRIEF-A lost predictive power when accounting for psychological distress at treatment initiation. WASI predicted psychological distress at year one, but not at year five. CONCLUSIONS: Results from MoCA and WASI was found to be less sensitive to the effect of psychological distress than BRIEF-A. Cognitive impairment at treatment initiation may hold predictive value on later psychological distress, yet its clinical utility is uncertain.
背景:多物质使用障碍(pSUD)、精神疾病和认知障碍之间的关联已得到充分证实,并与物质使用障碍治疗的负面结果相关。然而,目前尚不清楚认知障碍是否能预测接受治疗的 pSUD 患者在治疗开始后长期的心理困扰。本研究旨在调查认知障碍与治疗开始后 1 年和 5 年心理困扰之间的关联及其预测能力。
方法:在治疗开始时,我们对 164 名寻求治疗的 pSUD 患者进行了抽样。我们考察了在治疗开始时使用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、韦氏成人智力量表简版(WASI)和行为评定量表-执行功能成人版(BRIEF-A)评估的认知障碍与治疗开始时的症状清单-90 修订版(SCL-90-R)定义的心理困扰之间的关联,以及 1 年和 5 年后的心理困扰。我们进行了分层逻辑回归分析,以评估在治疗开始时进行的各种认知测试的预测能力,这些测试分别预测了在治疗开始 1 年和 5 年后测量的心理困扰,包括测量时的心理困扰和物质摄入,作为协变量。
结果:主要结果是 MoCA 和 BRIEF-A 预测了 1 年和 5 年的心理困扰,但在考虑到治疗开始时的心理困扰时,BRIEF-A 的预测能力丧失。WASI 预测了 1 年的心理困扰,但不能预测 5 年的心理困扰。
结论:MoCA 和 WASI 的结果被发现比 BRIEF-A 对心理困扰的影响不太敏感。治疗开始时的认知障碍可能对以后的心理困扰有预测价值,但临床实用性尚不确定。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024-12-13
Front Public Health. 2024
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021-8-14
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021-9-1
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021-6