Microbiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Division of Surgery Research, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 20;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03299-x.
BACKGROUND: Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is frequent in the intensive care unit (ICU), potentially leading to a heightened risk of nosocomial infections. Enhancing the gut microbiome has been proposed as a strategic approach to mitigate potential adverse outcomes. While prior research on select probiotic supplements has not successfully shown to improve gut microbial diversity, fermented foods offer a promising alternative. In this open-label phase I safety and feasibility study, we examined the safety and feasibility of kefir as an initial step towards utilizing fermented foods to mitigate gut dysbiosis in critically ill patients. METHODS: We administered kefir in escalating doses (60 mL, followed by 120 mL after 12 h, then 240 mL daily) to 54 critically ill patients with an intact gastrointestinal tract. To evaluate kefir's safety, we monitored for gastrointestinal symptoms. Feasibility was determined by whether patients received a minimum of 75% of their assigned kefir doses. To assess changes in the gut microbiome composition following kefir administration, we collected two stool samples from 13 patients: one within 72 h of admission to the ICU and another at least 72 h after the first stool sample. RESULTS: After administering kefir, none of the 54 critically ill patients exhibited signs of kefir-related bacteremia. No side effects like bloating, vomiting, or aspiration were noted, except for diarrhea in two patients concurrently on laxatives. Out of the 393 kefir doses prescribed for all participants, 359 (91%) were successfully administered. We were able to collect an initial stool sample from 29 (54%) patients and a follow-up sample from 13 (24%) patients. Analysis of the 26 paired samples revealed no increase in gut microbial α-diversity between the two timepoints. However, there was a significant improvement in the Gut Microbiome Wellness Index (GMWI) by the second timepoint (P = 0.034, one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test); this finding supports our hypothesis that kefir administration can improve gut health in critically ill patients. Additionally, the known microbial species in kefir were found to exhibit varying levels of engraftment in patients' guts. CONCLUSIONS: Providing kefir to critically ill individuals is safe and feasible. Our findings warrant a larger evaluation of kefir's safety, tolerability, and impact on gut microbiome dysbiosis in patients admitted to the ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05416814; trial registered on June 13, 2022.
背景:肠道微生物组失调在重症监护病房(ICU)中很常见,可能会增加医院获得性感染的风险。增强肠道微生物组被认为是减轻潜在不良后果的一种策略方法。虽然先前对特定益生菌补充剂的研究并未成功表明可以改善肠道微生物多样性,但发酵食品提供了一种有希望的替代方法。在这项开放性、I 期安全性和可行性研究中,我们研究了使用开菲尔作为利用发酵食品减轻危重症患者肠道菌群失调的初始步骤的安全性和可行性。
方法:我们给 54 名胃肠道完整的危重症患者递增剂量的开菲尔(60ml,12 小时后 120ml,然后每天 240ml)。为了评估开菲尔的安全性,我们监测了胃肠道症状。通过患者接受至少 75%的指定开菲尔剂量来确定可行性。为了评估开菲尔给药后肠道微生物组组成的变化,我们从 13 名患者中收集了两份粪便样本:一份在入住 ICU 的 72 小时内,另一份在第一份粪便样本至少 72 小时后。
结果:在给予开菲尔后,54 名危重症患者均未出现与开菲尔相关的菌血症迹象。除了同时使用泻药的两名患者出现腹胀、呕吐或吸入外,没有观察到其他副作用,如腹泻。对于所有参与者的 393 剂开菲尔,有 359 剂(91%)成功给药。我们能够从 29 名(54%)患者中收集初始粪便样本,从 13 名(24%)患者中收集后续样本。对 26 对样本的分析显示,两次检测之间肠道微生物 α-多样性没有增加。然而,第二次检测时肠道微生物组健康指数(GMWI)显著改善(P=0.034,单侧 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验);这一发现支持我们的假设,即开菲尔给药可以改善危重症患者的肠道健康。此外,在患者肠道中发现了开菲尔中已知的微生物物种,它们的定植水平不同。
结论:为危重症个体提供开菲尔是安全可行的。我们的发现证明需要更大规模地评估开菲尔在 ICU 住院患者中的安全性、耐受性和对肠道微生物组失调的影响。
试验注册:NCT05416814;试验于 2022 年 6 月 13 日注册。
Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2024-2
mSphere. 2016-8-31
Microbiol Spectr. 2024-3-5
Nutr Clin Pract. 2018-12-18
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025-8-9
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025
Int J Mol Sci. 2024-9-8
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021-6-4