Department of Rehabilitation, Itami Kousei Neurosurgical Hospital, 1-300-1, Nishino, Itami, Hyogo, Japan.
Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 20;14(1):4151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54815-1.
Previous studies have reported the effects of vibratory stimulation (VS) therapy in reducing upper extremity spasticity after stroke. However, the effective location of the VS in patients with stroke remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the VS location that is most effective in reducing post-stroke finger and wrist flexor spasticity. We enrolled 27 consecutive patients with stroke and upper extremity spasticity in this retrospective observational study. The participants received stretching, tendon vibration, and muscle belly vibration for 5 min over a period of 3 days. To evaluate spasticity, we assessed the Modified Ashworth Scale score before and immediately after each treatment and immediately after voluntary finger flexion. Participants who received tendon vibration showed greater improvement in flexor tone in the fingers than participants who received stretching and muscle belly vibration (P < 0.05 and < 0.001, respectively). Participants who underwent VS showed no significant improvement in the wrist flexor tone compared to those who underwent stretching. Our results suggest that the tendon may be the most effective location for treating spasticity of the finger flexor muscles and that VS may not significantly improve spasticity of the wrist flexors more than stretching.
先前的研究报告了振动刺激(VS)疗法在降低中风后上肢痉挛的作用。然而,中风患者 VS 的有效位置尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定最有效地降低中风后手指和腕部屈肌痉挛的 VS 位置。我们在这项回顾性观察研究中纳入了 27 例连续中风和上肢痉挛患者。参与者接受拉伸、肌腱振动和肌腹振动,为期 3 天,每天 5 分钟。为了评估痉挛程度,我们在每次治疗前后以及自愿手指弯曲后立即评估改良 Ashworth 量表评分。与接受拉伸和肌腹振动的参与者相比,接受肌腱振动的参与者的手指屈肌张力改善更大(分别为 P < 0.05 和 P < 0.001)。与拉伸相比,接受 VS 的参与者的腕部屈肌张力没有显著改善。我们的结果表明,肌腱可能是治疗手指屈肌痉挛最有效的部位,VS 可能不如拉伸那样显著改善腕部屈肌的痉挛。