Papier Irena, Chermesh Irit, Mashiach Tanya, Gruenwald Ilan, Banasiewicz Tomasz
Nursing Administration, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Institute of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Mar;34(3):849-859. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17076. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
To provide a snapshot of the current use of oral nutritional supplements, its association with inpatient characteristics, and with a focus on the role of nursing monitoring of food intake and implementing nutritional interventions for patients with low intake.
Retrospective cohort study.
The study collected data from a hospital database regarding oral nutritional supplement initiation and variables of patients hospitalised in internal medicine departments, who did not receive enteral or parenteral nutrition.
Of the 5155 admissions, 1087 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (47% female; mean age, 72.4 ± 14.6 years; mean length of stay, 14.6 ± 11.4 days). Sufficient food intake reporting was noted in 74.6% of the patients; of these 17% had decreased intake. Oral nutritional supplements and non-oral nutritional supplements groups did not differ in terms of sex, age, length of stay, Charlson Comorbidity Index, proportion of nursing reports, and absence of intake monitoring. Oral nutritional supplements were initiated in 31.9% of patients with a Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool score ≥2 and in 34.6% with decreased food intake. On multivariable analysis, hypoalbuminemia (adjusted odds ratio, 3.70), decreased food intake (adjusted odds ratio, 3.38), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool score ≥2 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10), and age <70 years (adjusted odds ratio, 1.56) were significantly associated with oral nutritional supplements use.
The prevalence of oral nutritional intervention was suboptimal in patients at risk of malnutrition during acute hospitalisation, although decreased food intake and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool score ≥2 independently increased the probability of oral nutritional supplements initiation.
Understanding the clinical practice and nursing impact of care management in relation to nutritional intervention can assist in reviewing and improving patient care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE IMPACT (ADDRESSING): This study informs clinical management and influences nursing practice standards related to assessing, monitoring, and managing malnutrition risk.
The study impacts the quality of care for patients at risk of malnutrition.
We adhered to the STROBE Checklist for cohort studies.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
提供口服营养补充剂当前使用情况的概述,及其与住院患者特征的关联,并重点关注食物摄入量的护理监测以及对摄入量低的患者实施营养干预的作用。
回顾性队列研究。
该研究从医院数据库收集了有关口服营养补充剂起始情况以及内科住院患者(未接受肠内或肠外营养)变量的数据。
在5155例入院患者中,1087例符合纳入标准(女性占47%;平均年龄72.4±14.6岁;平均住院时间14.6±11.4天)。74.6%的患者报告食物摄入量充足;其中17%的患者摄入量减少。口服营养补充剂组和非口服营养补充剂组在性别、年龄、住院时间、Charlson合并症指数、护理报告比例以及缺乏摄入量监测方面无差异。31.9%的营养不良通用筛查工具评分≥2的患者和34.6%食物摄入量减少的患者开始使用口服营养补充剂。多变量分析显示,低白蛋白血症(调整后的优势比为3.70)、食物摄入量减少(调整后的优势比为3.38)、营养不良通用筛查工具评分≥2(调整后的优势比为2.10)以及年龄<70岁(调整后的优势比为1.56)与口服营养补充剂的使用显著相关。
急性住院期间有营养不良风险的患者口服营养干预的普及率未达最佳,尽管食物摄入量减少和营养不良通用筛查工具评分≥2独立增加了开始使用口服营养补充剂的可能性。
了解营养干预护理管理的临床实践和护理影响有助于审查和改善患者护理。对专业和/或患者护理影响的意义(解决问题):本研究为临床管理提供信息,并影响与评估、监测和管理营养不良风险相关的护理实践标准。
该研究影响有营养不良风险患者的护理质量。
我们遵循队列研究的STROBE清单。
无患者或公众贡献。