Lee Lin Tai Linus, Chiu Christopher Pak Hey, Ma Man Kee Teresa, Kwong Lee Ting, Hung Man Wai Catherine, Chan Yuen Yee Yannie, Wong Eunice Joanna, Lai Theodora Hei Tung, Chan Oi Ka, So Po Lam, Lau Wai Lam, Leung Tak Yeung
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong (Dr Lee).
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong (Dr Chiu, Ms Chan, and Prof Leung).
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jan 19;4(1):100312. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100312. eCollection 2024 Feb.
This study aimed to systematically review the worldwide second-stage cesarean delivery rate concerning pre-second-stage cesarean delivery and assisted vaginal birth rates.
PubMed, Medline Ovid, EBSCOhost, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were queried from inception to February 2023, with the following terms: "full dilatation," "second stage," and "cesarean," with their word variations. Furthermore, an additional cohort of 353,434 cases from our recently published study was included.
Only original studies that provided sufficient information on the number of pre-second-stage cesarean deliveries, second-stage cesarean deliveries, and vaginal births were included for the calculation of different modes of delivery. Systemic reviews, meta-analyses, or case reports were excluded.
Study identification and data extraction were independently performed by 2 authors. Selected studies were categorized on the basis of parity, study period, and geographic regions for comparison.
A total of 25 studies were included. The overall pre-second-stage cesarean delivery rate, the second-stage cesarean delivery rate, and the second-stage cesarean delivery-to-assisted vaginal birth ratio were 17.94%, 2.65%, and 0.19, respectively. Only 5 studies described singleton, term, cephalic presenting pregnancies of nulliparous women, and their second-stage cesarean delivery rates were significantly higher than those studies with cohorts of all parity groups (4.50% vs 0.83%; <.05). In addition, the second-stage cesarean delivery rate showed a secular increase across 2009 (0.70% vs 1.05%; <.05). Moreover, it was the highest among African studies (5.14%) but the lowest among studies from East Asia and South Asia (0.94%). The distributions of second-stage cesarean delivery rates of individual studies and subgroups were shown with that of pre-second-stage cesarean delivery and assisted vaginal birth using the bubble chart.
The overall worldwide pre-second-stage cesarean delivery rate was 17.94%, the second-stage cesarean delivery rate was 2.65%, and the second-stage cesarean delivery-to-assisted vaginal birth ratio was 0.19. The African studies had the highest second-stage cesarean delivery rate (5.14%) and second-stage cesarean delivery-to-assisted vaginal birth ratio (1.88), whereas the studies from East Asia and South Asia were opposite (0.94% and 0.11, respectively).
本研究旨在系统回顾全球范围内与第二产程前剖宫产率和阴道助产率相关的第二产程剖宫产率。
检索了PubMed、Medline Ovid、EBSCOhost、Embase、Scopus和谷歌学术数据库,检索时间从建库至2023年2月,检索词如下:“宫口开全”“第二产程”和“剖宫产”及其变体。此外,纳入了我们最近发表的研究中的另外353,434例病例。
仅纳入能提供足够关于第二产程前剖宫产、第二产程剖宫产和阴道分娩数量信息的原始研究,以计算不同分娩方式。排除系统评价、Meta分析或病例报告。
由两名作者独立进行研究识别和数据提取。根据产次、研究时间段和地理区域对选定研究进行分类以作比较。
共纳入25项研究。第二产程前剖宫产总体发生率、第二产程剖宫产率以及第二产程剖宫产与阴道助产比率分别为17.94%、2.65%和0.19。仅有5项研究描述了初产妇单胎、足月、头先露妊娠情况,其第二产程剖宫产率显著高于所有产次组的研究(4.50% 对0.83%;P<0.05)。此外,2009年期间第二产程剖宫产率呈长期上升趋势(0.70% 对1.05%;P<0.05)。而且,非洲研究中的该比率最高(5.14%),而东亚和南亚研究中的比率最低(0.94%)。使用气泡图展示了各研究及亚组的第二产程剖宫产率分布以及第二产程前剖宫产率和阴道助产率分布。
全球范围内第二产程前剖宫产总体发生率为17.94%,第二产程剖宫产率为2.65%,第二产程剖宫产与阴道助产比率为0.19。非洲研究中的第二产程剖宫产率最高(5.14%),第二产程剖宫产与阴道助产比率最高(1.88),而东亚和南亚研究则相反(分别为0.94%和0.11)。