Zhen Liang, Juan Wang, Tianrui Feng, Yuliang Chen, Zhien Zhou, Yi Zhou, Weigang Yan, Fenghong Cao
Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024 Apr;196:104273. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104273. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
Researchers have shown that using next-generation hormonal agents (NHA) for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) would lead to increased risk of cardiac adverse effects, making clinician choices more complex.
We systematically searched Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for research published before October 2022. Agents were ranked according to their effectiveness based on cardiac adverse effects using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve.
A total of 21 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) with 19, 083 patients were included in present study. Our results showed that abiraterone and enzalutamide could lead to a significantly higher hypertension rate compared with placebo; whereas no significant difference was detected between four NHAs and placebo in ischemic heart disease incidence. All four NHAs could significantly increase the risk of cardiotoxicity.
NHAs are generally acceptable in terms of cardiovascular disease compared to placebo in patients with CRPC.
研究人员表明,使用新一代激素药物(NHA)治疗去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)会增加心脏不良反应的风险,这使得临床医生的选择更加复杂。
我们系统检索了截至2022年10月发表在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase数据库上的研究。根据累积排序曲线下面积,依据心脏不良反应将药物按有效性进行排名。
本研究共纳入21项随机对照试验(RCT),涉及19083例患者。我们的结果显示,与安慰剂相比,阿比特龙和恩杂鲁胺可导致显著更高的高血压发生率;而在缺血性心脏病发病率方面,四种NHA与安慰剂之间未检测到显著差异。所有四种NHA均可显著增加心脏毒性风险。
在CRPC患者中,与安慰剂相比,NHA在心血管疾病方面总体上是可接受的。