Suppr超能文献

SMART-ESAS:用于癌症患者的 Edmonton 症状评估系统评分的实时智能手机监测和评估。

SMART-ESAS: Smartphone Monitoring and Assessment in Real Time of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Scores for Patients With Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Dr B.R.A. IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Feb;10:e2300447. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00447.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Serial patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements in clinical practice are associated with a better quality of life and survival. Recording electronic PROs using smartphones is an efficient way to implement this. We aimed to assess the feasibility of the electronically filled Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (e-ESAS) scale in the lower-middle-income country (LMIC) setting.

METHODS

Baseline clinical features and conventional paper-based ESAS (p-ESAS) were collected in newly diagnosed patients with solid organ tumors. Text message link was sent to these patients for filling e-ESAS. ESAS was categorized into physical, psychological, and total symptom domains. Scores were divided into none to mild (0-3) and moderate to severe (4-10). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine the correlation between p-ESAS and e-ESAS. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent factors affecting symptom burden.

RESULTS

Of 1,160 participants who filled out p-ESAS, 595 completed both e-ESAS and p-ESAS questionnaires and were included in the final analysis. Moderate to severe physical, psychological, and total symptom scores were seen in 39.8%, 40%, and 39% of participants. Tiredness and anxiety were the most common physical and psychological symptoms, respectively. ICCs between the p-ESAS and e-ESAS varied between 0.75 and 0.9. Total symptom scores were independently predicted by metastatic disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.67; = .001) and a higher level of education (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.72; = .001).

CONCLUSION

Paper-based and electronically filled ESASs have good intraobserver reliability across individual symptoms and domain scores in a representative cohort at a tertiary care institute in the LMIC. This may help us incorporate e-ESAS in routine clinical care in the real-world setting with financial, infrastructural, and manpower limitations.

摘要

目的

在临床实践中,对患者报告的结局(PRO)进行连续测量与生活质量和生存的改善相关。使用智能手机记录电子患者报告结局(e-PRO)是实现这一目标的有效方法。我们旨在评估在中低收入国家(LMIC)环境中使用电子埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(e-ESAS)量表的可行性。

方法

在新诊断的实体瘤患者中收集基线临床特征和传统纸质版 ESAS(p-ESAS)。向这些患者发送短信链接以填写电子 ESAS。ESAS 分为生理、心理和总症状域。评分分为无到轻度(0-3)和中度到重度(4-10)。采用组内相关系数(ICC)来确定 p-ESAS 与 e-ESAS 之间的相关性。采用多变量逻辑回归来确定影响症状负担的独立因素。

结果

在填写 p-ESAS 的 1160 名参与者中,有 595 名完成了 e-ESAS 和 p-ESAS 问卷,并被纳入最终分析。39.8%、40%和 39%的参与者存在中重度生理、心理和总症状评分。疲劳和焦虑分别是最常见的生理和心理症状。p-ESAS 与 e-ESAS 之间的 ICC 在 0.75 到 0.9 之间。总症状评分独立地由转移性疾病(比值比 [OR],1.83;95%置信区间 [CI],1.26 至 2.67;P=.001)和较高的教育水平(OR,0.42;95%CI,0.25 至 0.72;P=.001)预测。

结论

在 LMIC 中的三级护理机构中,代表性队列中个体症状和域评分的纸质版和电子版 ESAS 具有良好的观察者内可靠性。这可能有助于我们在存在财务、基础设施和人力限制的实际情况下将 e-ESAS 纳入常规临床护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a43e/10898676/3910a5bdc062/go-10-e2300447-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验