Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Eduardus Hospital, 50679, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, 3500, Krems, Austria.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1467-1473. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02471-5. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of assessing preoperative conventional X-ray diagnostics in determining whether a comminuted clavicle fracture is present.
A total of 326 patients with complete clinical and radiological documentation treated for a central clavicle fracture at the author's department between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2023, were included. Among these, 73 were female, and 253 were male in a mean age of 37.5 ± 17 years.
On preoperative X-ray images or operation reports, 109 (33%) or 78 (24%) simple and 217 (67%) or 248 (76%) comminuted fractures were identified. Thity-one out of 248 comminuted fractures were only discovered intraoperatively, accounting for 13%. According to the AO classification on preoperative X-ray or operation reports, 109 or 78 fractures were classified as type A (33% or 24%), 51 or 45 as type B (16% or 14%), and 166 or 203 as type C (51% or 62%). For 40 patients, the discrepancy between the preoperative X-ray and the intraoperative fracture type led to a change in the surgical procedure. This represents 12% of the total cohort or 91% of the fractures that were classified differently preoperatively compared to intraoperatively. In these cases, fractures were treated with open reduction and angular stable plate osteosynthesis instead of the preoperatively planned elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN).
The results of this study suggest that conventional X-ray diagnostics may not always detect comminuted clavicle shaft fractures. The treating physician should be aware of this issue.
本研究旨在评估术前常规 X 射线诊断在确定粉碎性锁骨骨折是否存在方面的可靠性。
共纳入 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 30 日在作者所在科室接受治疗的 326 例完整临床和影像学资料的中央锁骨骨折患者。其中,女性 73 例,男性 253 例,平均年龄 37.5±17 岁。
术前 X 射线图像或手术报告中,109 例(33%)或 78 例(24%)为单纯性骨折,217 例(67%)或 248 例(76%)为粉碎性骨折。248 例粉碎性骨折中有 31 例仅在术中发现,占 13%。根据术前 X 射线或手术报告的 AO 分类,109 例或 78 例骨折为 A 型(33%或 24%),51 例或 45 例为 B 型(16%或 14%),166 例或 203 例为 C 型(51%或 62%)。对于 40 例患者,术前 X 射线与术中骨折类型之间的差异导致手术方式发生改变。这占总队列的 12%或术前与术中分类不同的骨折的 91%。在这些病例中,骨折采用切开复位和角度稳定钢板内固定治疗,而不是术前计划的弹性稳定髓内钉(ESIN)。
本研究结果表明,常规 X 射线诊断可能并不总是能检测到粉碎性锁骨骨干骨折。治疗医生应该意识到这一问题。