Suppr超能文献

Pipeline 栓塞装置 (PED) 护盾与 PED/PED Flex 之间的血栓栓塞事件比较:倾向评分匹配分析。

Comparison of Thromboembolic Events Between Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) Shield and PED/PED Flex: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

机构信息

Neurosurgical Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston , Massachusetts , USA.

Neurosurgery Department, Harvard Medical School, Boston , Massachusetts , USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2024 Aug 1;95(2):330-338. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002883. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The pipeline embolization device (PED) Flex with Shield technology is a third-generation flow diverter used for intracranial aneurysm treatment designed to decrease thrombogenicity through a phosphorylcholine coating. Herein, we aim to compare the rate of thromboembolic events in PED with Shield technology and PED without it through propensity score matching.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of aneurysms treated with PED first-generation/PED Flex and PED with Shield between 2013 and 2023 at a single academic institution. Patients were matched through propensity score by controlling for confounding factors including age, smoking history, diabetes, previous subarachnoid hemorrhage, modified Rankin Scale pretreatment, location, aneurysm size, previous treatment, and clopidogrel or aspirin resistance. After matching, we evaluated for periprocedural and postoperative thromboembolic events. Data analysis was performed using Stata 14.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients with 707 aneurysms treated in 605 procedures were included in the analysis. From these, 156 aneurysms were treated with PED with Shield (22.07%) and 551 (77.93%) without Shield technology. Propensity score matching resulted in 84 matched pairs. The rate of thromboembolic events was 3.57% for PED Shield and 10.71% for PED first-generation/PED Flex ( P = .07), while retreatment rates were 2.38% for PED Shield and 8.32% for PED Flex ( P = .09). Complete occlusion at first ( P = .41) and last imaging follow-up ( P = .71), in-stent stenosis ( P = .95), hemorrhagic complications ( P = .31), and functional outcomes ( P = .66) were comparable for both groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study in the literature performing a propensity scored-matched analysis comparing PED with PED with Shield technology. Our study suggests a trend toward lower thromboembolic events for PED Shield, even after controlling for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, and a trend toward lower aneurysm retreatment rates with PED Shield, without reaching statistical significance.

摘要

背景与目的

Pipeline 栓塞装置(PED)Flex with Shield 技术是第三代血流转向装置,用于颅内动脉瘤治疗,旨在通过磷酸胆碱涂层降低血栓形成。在此,我们旨在通过倾向评分匹配比较具有和不具有 Shield 技术的 PED 的血栓栓塞事件发生率。

方法

我们对 2013 年至 2023 年在一家学术机构接受第一代 PED/Flex 和 PED with Shield 治疗的动脉瘤患者进行了回顾性分析。通过倾向评分匹配控制年龄、吸烟史、糖尿病、既往蛛网膜下腔出血、治疗前改良 Rankin 量表评分、位置、动脉瘤大小、既往治疗以及氯吡格雷或阿司匹林抵抗等混杂因素,对患者进行匹配。匹配后,我们评估了围手术期和术后的血栓栓塞事件。数据分析使用 Stata 14 进行。

结果

共纳入 605 例患者的 707 个动脉瘤,其中 156 个动脉瘤接受了 PED with Shield(22.07%)治疗,551 个(77.93%)未接受 Shield 技术治疗。倾向评分匹配后得到 84 对匹配。PED Shield 的血栓栓塞事件发生率为 3.57%,第一代 PED/Flex 的发生率为 10.71%( P =.07),而再次治疗的发生率分别为 2.38%和 8.32%( P =.09)。两组患者的首次( P =.41)和末次影像学随访时( P =.71)完全闭塞率、支架内狭窄( P =.95)、出血性并发症( P =.31)和功能结局( P =.66)无显著差异。

结论

这是文献中首次进行倾向评分匹配分析比较具有和不具有 Shield 技术的 PED。我们的研究表明,PED Shield 的血栓栓塞事件发生率较低,即使在控制了阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抵抗的情况下,且 PED Shield 的动脉瘤再治疗率也较低,但未达到统计学意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验