Suppr超能文献

ChatGPT 是否了解急性冠状动脉综合征和相关的欧洲心脏病学会指南?

Is ChatGPT knowledgeable of acute coronary syndromes and pertinent European Society of Cardiology Guidelines?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Gurlife Hospital, Eskisehir, Türkiye -

Department of Cardiology, Private Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2024 Jun;72(3):299-303. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5683.24.06517-7. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advancements in artificial intelligence are being seen in multiple fields, including medicine, and this trend is likely to continue going forward. To analyze the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT answers about acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

METHODS

The questions asked to ChatGPT were prepared in two categories. A list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) created from inquiries asked by the public and while preparing the scientific question list, 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for the management of ACS and ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines were used. Accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT responses about ACS were evaluated by two cardiologists with ten years of experience using Global Quality Score (GQS).

RESULTS

Eventually, 72 FAQs related to ACS met the study inclusion criteria. In total, 65 (90.3%) ChatGPT answers scored GQS 5, which indicated highest accuracy and proficiency. None of the ChatGPT responses to FAQs about ACS scored GQS 1. In addition, highest accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT answers was obtained for the prevention and lifestyle section with GQS 5 for 19 (95%) answers, and GQS 4 for 1 (5%) answer. In contrast, accuracy and proficiency of ChatGPT answers were lowest for the treatment and management section. Moreover, 68 (88.3%) ChatGPT responses for guideline based questions scored GQS 5. Reproducibility of ChatGPT answers was 94.4% for FAQs and 90.9% for ESC guidelines questions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows for the first time that ChatGPT can give accurate and sufficient responses to more than 90% of FAQs about ACS. In addition, proficiency and correctness of ChatGPT answers about questions depending on ESC guidelines was also substantial.

摘要

背景

人工智能在多个领域取得了进展,包括医学领域,而且这种趋势很可能会持续下去。分析 ChatGPT 对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)回答的准确性和可重复性。

方法

向 ChatGPT 提出的问题分为两类。一类是从公众咨询和准备科学问题列表时创建的常见问题解答(FAQ)列表;另一类是使用 2023 年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ACS 管理指南和 ESC 临床实践指南准备的问题列表。两位具有十年经验的心脏病专家使用全球质量评分(GQS)评估 ChatGPT 对 ACS 的回答的准确性和可重复性。

结果

最终,有 72 个与 ACS 相关的 FAQ 符合研究纳入标准。总共,65(90.3%)个 ChatGPT 回答的 GQS 得分为 5,这表明准确性和熟练度最高。ACS 相关 FAQ 的 ChatGPT 回答没有一个得分为 1。此外,ChatGPT 对预防和生活方式部分的回答准确性和可靠性最高,其中 19(95%)个回答的 GQS 得分为 5,1(5%)个回答的 GQS 得分为 4。相比之下,ChatGPT 对治疗和管理部分的回答准确性和熟练度最低。此外,68(88.3%)个基于指南的问题的 ChatGPT 回答的 GQS 得分为 5。FAQ 的可重复性为 94.4%,ESC 指南问题的可重复性为 90.9%。

结论

这项研究首次表明,ChatGPT 可以对超过 90%的 ACS FAQ 给出准确和充分的回答。此外,ChatGPT 对 ESC 指南问题的回答的熟练度和正确性也相当高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验