Pham Du, Chi Bradley, Skelton Felicia, Huang Donna
H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Spinal Cord Injury Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 May;48(3):536-541. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2311348. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Despite urinary tract infections (UTIs) being a common problem in patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), and a well-known complication of invasive urologic procedures, little consensus exists regarding the standard of care for peri-procedural antibiotic use for SCI patients undergoing urodynamics studies (UDS). Our research seeks to evaluate local antibiotic prophylaxis pattern in SCI patients undergoing UDS, assess incidence of post-procedural UTI, describe local antibiotic resistance trends, and provide antibiotic stewardship considerations to guide future practice.
DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of SCI patients undergoing UDS from January 2010 to January 2020 at a Veterans Affairs SCI Center. Data on patient demographics, UTI risk factors, pre-procedural urinalysis and culture, and peri-procedural antibiotics was extracted. Incidence of post-procedural UTI was tabulated. Findings were summarized using descriptive statistics.
331 patients were studied. Pre-procedural urine culture was done in 73% of cases, with positive results in 49%. was the most commonly isolated organism (19%). Antibiotics were used in 86% of cases, 26% of which had a negative culture. A onetime dose of intramuscular gentamicin given immediately pre-procedure was the most common practice (53%; = 152). No cases of post-procedural UTIs were identified during the study period.
No post-UDS UTIs occurred under current local practice where most patients received a one-time dose of intramuscular gentamicin as prophylaxis. Though routine gentamicin prophylaxis may play a role in reducing UTI incidence, the low rate of post-UDS UTI in this population, including patients with positive cultures who received no antibiotics, suggests the possibility of refining practice patterns to improve antibiotic stewardship.
背景/目的:尽管尿路感染(UTIs)在脊髓损伤(SCIs)患者中是一个常见问题,并且是侵入性泌尿外科手术的一个众所周知的并发症,但对于接受尿动力学研究(UDS)的SCI患者围手术期抗生素使用的护理标准,几乎没有达成共识。我们的研究旨在评估接受UDS的SCI患者的局部抗生素预防模式,评估术后UTI的发生率,描述局部抗生素耐药趋势,并提供抗生素管理方面的考虑因素以指导未来的实践。
设计/地点/参与者:对2010年1月至2020年1月在退伍军人事务SCI中心接受UDS的SCI患者进行回顾性队列研究。提取了患者人口统计学、UTI危险因素、术前尿液分析和培养以及围手术期抗生素的数据。将术后UTI的发生率制成表格。使用描述性统计对结果进行总结。
研究了331名患者。73%的病例进行了术前尿培养,其中49%结果为阳性。 是最常分离出的病原体(19%)。86%的病例使用了抗生素,其中26%的培养结果为阴性。术前立即给予单次肌肉注射庆大霉素是最常见的做法(53%; = 152)。在研究期间未发现术后UTI病例。
在当前的局部实践中,大多数患者接受单次肌肉注射庆大霉素作为预防措施,未发生UDS后UTI。尽管常规庆大霉素预防可能在降低UTI发生率方面发挥作用,但该人群中UDS后UTI的低发生率,包括培养结果为阳性但未接受抗生素治疗的患者,表明有可能优化实践模式以改善抗生素管理。