Mantovani Dimitri B A, Pitombeira Milena S, Schuck Phelipi N, de Araújo Adriel S, Buchpiguel Carlos Alberto, de Paula Faria Daniele, M da Silva Ana Maria
Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-911, Brazil.
Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine (LIM 43), Department of Radiology and Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-911, Brazil.
J Imaging. 2024 Jan 31;10(2):39. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10020039.
This study aims to evaluate non-invasive PET quantification methods for (R)-[C]PK11195 uptake measurement in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and healthy controls (HC) in comparison with arterial input function (AIF) using dynamic (R)-[C]PK11195 PET and magnetic resonance images. The total volume of distribution (VT) and distribution volume ratio (DVR) were measured in the gray matter, white matter, caudate nucleus, putamen, pallidum, thalamus, cerebellum, and brainstem using AIF, the image-derived input function (IDIF) from the carotid arteries, and pseudo-reference regions from supervised clustering analysis (SVCA). Uptake differences between MS and HC groups were tested using statistical tests adjusted for age and sex, and correlations between the results from the different quantification methods were also analyzed. Significant DVR differences were observed in the gray matter, white matter, putamen, pallidum, thalamus, and brainstem of MS patients when compared to the HC group. Also, strong correlations were found in DVR values between non-invasive methods and AIF (0.928 for IDIF and 0.975 for SVCA, < 0.0001). On the other hand, (R)-[C]PK11195 uptake could not be differentiated between MS patients and HC using VT values, and a weak correlation (0.356, < 0.0001) was found between VT and VT. Our study shows that the best alternative for AIF is using SVCA for reference region modeling, in addition to a cautious and appropriate methodology.
本研究旨在评估用于测量多发性硬化症(MS)患者和健康对照(HC)中(R)-[C]PK11195摄取的非侵入性PET定量方法,并与使用动态(R)-[C]PK11195 PET和磁共振图像的动脉输入函数(AIF)进行比较。使用AIF、来自颈动脉的图像衍生输入函数(IDIF)以及监督聚类分析(SVCA)的伪参考区域,测量灰质、白质、尾状核、壳核、苍白球、丘脑、小脑和脑干中的分布总体积(VT)和分布体积比(DVR)。使用针对年龄和性别调整的统计检验来测试MS组和HC组之间的摄取差异,并且还分析了不同定量方法结果之间的相关性。与HC组相比,在MS患者的灰质、白质、壳核、苍白球、丘脑和脑干中观察到显著的DVR差异。此外,在非侵入性方法和AIF的DVR值之间发现了强相关性(IDIF为0.928,SVCA为0.975,<0.0001)。另一方面,使用VT值无法区分MS患者和HC之间的(R)-[C]PK11195摄取,并且在VT和VT之间发现了弱相关性(0.356,<0.0001)。我们的研究表明,除了谨慎和适当的方法外,AIF的最佳替代方法是使用SVCA进行参考区域建模。