• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证工作中的黑暗四天王量表的意大利语版本。

Validation of the Italian version of the Dark Tetrad at Work scale.

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Department of Psychology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0298880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298880. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0298880
PMID:38394098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10889854/
Abstract

This study presents and validates the Italian adaptation of the Dark Tetrad at Work (DTW) scale, an instrument for assessing four socially aversive personality traits (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy and sadism) in the context of the workplace. A total of 300 Italian-speaking participants (50% female, M age = 32 years ± 9.2) and 253 English-speaking participants (38% female, M age = 39 years ± 12.1) were recruited via an online survey platform. The Italian-speaking sample was used to test the factorial structure, reliability and criterion-related validity of the Italian version of the DTW, whereas the English-speaking sample was used to test cross-language measurement invariance. Results from confirmatory factor analysis showed that the original four-factor model provided the best fit to the data. The Italian DTW scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with reliability coefficients of ω = .77 for narcissism, ω = .80 for Machiavellianism, and ω = .81 for both psychopathy and sadism. Concurrent associations between the DTW scales and negative and positive workplace outcomes supported the criterion validity of the scale. Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism positively correlated with counterproductive work behaviors and workplace bullying, and negatively with organizational citizenship behaviors and affective organizational commitment. In contrast, narcissism exhibited a unique pattern: It correlated positively with positive workplace behaviors and negatively with counterproductive behaviors toward the organization, but it was also found to be a significant predictor of workplace bullying. This finding may reflect multidimensional nature of narcissism, but a note of caution is warranted in interpreting this result, as all measurements relied on self-report instruments, introducing the possibility of socially desirable associations influencing the outcomes. Finally, the comparison with the English sample established configural, full metric and partial scale invariance, allowing for valid cross-language comparisons between Italian and English-speaking populations in the future. Preliminary Italian normative data were provided to offer a benchmark for the interpretation of DTW values. This study provides a reliable and valid instrument tailored to the Italian workforce, enhancing our understanding of dark personality traits within organizational contexts and providing organizations with an effective means to address and manage dark personality traits for a healthier workplace culture.

摘要

这项研究提出并验证了工作暗黑四天王量表(DTW)的意大利文适应性,该量表用于评估工作场所中四种具有社会危害性的人格特质(自恋、马基雅维利主义、精神病态和虐待狂)。共有 300 名讲意大利语的参与者(50%为女性,M 年龄=32 岁±9.2)和 253 名讲英语的参与者(38%为女性,M 年龄=39 岁±12.1)通过在线调查平台招募。讲意大利语的样本用于检验 DTW 意大利文版的因子结构、信度和效标关联效度,而讲英语的样本则用于检验跨语言测量不变性。验证性因子分析的结果表明,最初的四因子模型最符合数据。意大利文 DTW 量表表现出可接受的内部一致性,自恋的 ω 值为.77,马基雅维利主义的 ω 值为.80,精神病态和虐待狂的 ω 值均为.81。DTW 量表与负面和正面工作结果之间的同时关联支持了该量表的效标效度。马基雅维利主义、精神病态和虐待狂与反生产工作行为和工作场所欺凌呈正相关,与组织公民行为和情感组织承诺呈负相关。相比之下,自恋表现出一种独特的模式:它与积极的工作行为呈正相关,与反组织行为呈负相关,但也被发现是工作场所欺凌的一个重要预测因素。这一发现可能反映了自恋的多维度性质,但在解释这一结果时需要谨慎,因为所有的测量都依赖于自我报告的工具,这就有可能引入社会期望的关联影响结果。最后,与英语样本的比较建立了组态、全度量和部分量表不变性,允许未来在意大利语和英语人群之间进行有效的跨语言比较。提供了初步的意大利规范数据,为解释 DTW 值提供了基准。这项研究提供了一种适用于意大利劳动力的可靠有效的工具,增强了我们对组织背景下黑暗人格特质的理解,并为组织提供了一种有效的手段,以促进更健康的工作文化,应对和管理黑暗人格特质。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Italian version of the Dark Tetrad at Work scale.验证工作中的黑暗四天王量表的意大利语版本。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0298880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298880. eCollection 2024.
2
The Spanish Short Dark Tetrad (SD4): Association With Personality and Psychological Problems.西班牙短暗黑四因素(SD4):与人格和心理问题的关联。
Psicothema. 2024 May;36(2):195-204. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2023.172.
3
The dark side of internet: Preliminary evidence for the associations of dark personality traits with specific online activities and problematic internet use.互联网的阴暗面:黑暗人格特质与特定在线活动和网络问题使用之间关联的初步证据。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):993-1003. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.109. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
4
Social appearance anxiety among the dark tetrad and self-concealment.社交外表焦虑与黑暗人格四因素及自我隐匿。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 26;14(1):4667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55422-w.
5
Dark tetrad personality traits and counterproductive work behavior among doctors in Pakistan.巴基斯坦医生的黑暗人格特质四因素与反生产工作行为。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Sep;35(5):1173-1192. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3025. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
Examining the Short Dark Tetrad (SD4) Across Models, Correlates, and Gender.跨模型、相关因素及性别的黑暗人格四因子(SD4)研究
Assessment. 2022 Jun;29(4):651-667. doi: 10.1177/1073191120986624. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
Dark Tetrad personality traits, paraphilic interests, and the role of impulsivity: an EEG-study using a Go/No-Go paradigm.黑暗人格特质四联征、性癖好与冲动性的作用:使用 Go/No-Go 范式的脑电图研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61214-z.
8
The Dark Side of Humanity Scale: A reconstruction of the Dark Tetrad constructs.人性黑暗面量表:黑暗四天王结构的重构。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Feb;222:103461. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103461. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
9
Dark personality traits and deception, and the short dark tetrad (SD4) as integrity screening instrument.黑暗人格特质与欺骗,以及短暗黑人格特质四联(SD4)作为诚信筛查工具。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50968-7.
10
Selfitis Behavior: Assessing the Italian Version of the Selfitis Behavior Scale and Its Mediating Role in the Relationship of Dark Traits with Social Media Addiction.自病行为:评估自病行为量表的意大利版本及其在黑暗特质与社交媒体成瘾关系中的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 8;17(16):5738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165738.

本文引用的文献

1
I like it because it hurts you: On the association of everyday sadism, sadistic pleasure, and victim blaming.我喜欢它是因为它伤害了你:论日常施虐、施虐快感与指责受害者之间的关联。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Jan;126(1):105-127. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000464. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Dark Tetrad and workplace deviance: Investigating the moderating role of organizational justice perceptions.黑暗人格特质与职场偏差行为:探究组织公正感的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:968283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968283. eCollection 2022.
3
Enthusiastic Acts of Evil: The Assessment of Sadistic Personality in Polish and Italian Populations.狂热的恶行:波兰和意大利人群中施虐人格的评估。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Nov-Dec;102(6):770-780. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1673760. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
4
Leader dark traits, workplace bullying, and employee depression: Exploring mediation and the role of the dark core.领导者的黑暗特质、职场霸凌与员工抑郁:探究中介作用及黑暗核心的角色
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Oct;126(7):911-920. doi: 10.1037/abn0000299.
5
Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.测量不变性的惯例与报告:心理学研究的现状与未来方向
Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.有序数据的验证性因子分析:稳健极大似然法与对角加权最小二乘法的比较
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):936-49. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.
7
Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism.日常施虐癖的行为确认。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2201-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797613490749. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
8
A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: a social exchange perspective.《黑暗人格三联征与工作行为的元分析:社会交换视角》
J Appl Psychol. 2012 May;97(3):557-79. doi: 10.1037/a0025679. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
9
What does the narcissistic personality inventory really measure?自恋型人格问卷到底测量的是什么?
Assessment. 2011 Mar;18(1):67-87. doi: 10.1177/1073191110382845. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
10
Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance.为什么自恋者乍一看如此迷人?在完全不熟悉的情况下解码自恋与受欢迎程度的联系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan;98(1):132-45. doi: 10.1037/a0016338.