Suppr超能文献

抗感染联合治疗与单药治疗在耐碳青霉烯铜绿假单胞菌感染患者中的临床疗效比较:一项 10 年回顾性研究。

Clinical success of anti-infective combination therapy compare to monotherapy in patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: a 10-years retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Hospital,National Center of Gerontology, the Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Graduate School, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09060-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection has become a major public health concern. The recommendations for monotherapy and combination therapy in the current guidelines lack sufficient evidence to support them. The primary objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of anti-Infective combination therapy compared to monotherapy in achieving clinical success in patients with CRPA infection and risk factors of clinical failure of monotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective study from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) was conducted. We included adults with infections caused by CRPA. The outcomes of this study were clinical success, complete clinical success, and 28-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 279 subjects were finally enrolled. The rate of clinical success for combination therapy was higher than that for monotherapy (73.1% versus 60.4%, p=0.028). Compared to clinical failure patients, patients in the clinical success group were more likely to die within 28 days after CRPA was found (48.3% versus 3.6%, p<0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, monotherapy was found to be significantly correlated with clinical success (OR, 0.559, 95% CI, 0.321-0.976; p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy is more effective for CRPA infection patients, especially those whose SOFA score is ≥ 2 or whose Charlson comorbidity index is ≥ 6.

摘要

背景

耐碳青霉烯铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)感染已成为一个主要的公共卫生关注点。目前指南中关于单药治疗和联合治疗的建议缺乏足够的证据支持。本研究的主要目的是确定与单药治疗相比,抗感染联合治疗在实现 CRPA 感染和单药治疗临床失败风险因素患者临床成功方面的有效性。

方法

对来自医疗信息集市重症监护 IV 版(MIMIC-IV)的回顾性研究进行了分析。我们纳入了由 CRPA 引起感染的成年人。本研究的结局为临床成功、完全临床成功和 28 天全因死亡率。

结果

共纳入 279 例患者。联合治疗的临床成功率高于单药治疗(73.1% vs. 60.4%,p=0.028)。与临床失败患者相比,临床成功组患者在发现 CRPA 后 28 天内死亡的可能性更高(48.3% vs. 3.6%,p<0.001)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,单药治疗与临床成功显著相关(OR,0.559,95%CI,0.321-0.976;p=0.041)。

结论

联合治疗对 CRPA 感染患者更有效,特别是 SOFA 评分≥2 或 Charlson 合并症指数≥6 的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a0a/10885531/fa08a8d04479/12879_2024_9060_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验