Udonsom Ruenruetai, Adisakwattana Poom, Popruk Supaluk, Reamtong Onrapak, Jirapattharasate Charoonluk, Thiangtrongjit Tipparat, Rerkyusuke Sarinya, Chanlun Aran, Hasan Tanjila, Kotepui Manas, Siri Sukhontha, Nishikawa Yoshifumi, Mahittikorn Aongart
Department of Protozoology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 6;14(4):531. doi: 10.3390/ani14040531.
Bovine neosporosis is among the main causes of abortion in cattle worldwide, causing serious economic losses in the beef and dairy industries. A highly sensitive and specific diagnostic method for the assessment of the epidemiology of the disease, as well as it surveillance and management, is imperative, due to the absence of an effective treatment or vaccine against neosporosis. In the present study, the immunodiagnostic performance of peroxiredoxin 2 (NcPrx2), microneme 4 (NcMIC4), and surface antigen 1 (NcSAG1) to detect IgG antibodies against in cattle were evaluated and compared with that of the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). The results revealed that NcSAG1 had the highest sensitivity and specificity, with values of 88.4% and 80.7%, respectively, followed by NcPrx2, with a high sensitivity of 87.0% but a low specificity of 67.0%, whereas NcMIC4 showed sensitivity and specificity of 84.1% and 78.9%, respectively, when compared with IFAT. A high degree of agreement was observed for NcSAG1 (k = 0.713) recombinant protein, showing the highest diagnostic capability, followed by NcMIC4 (k = 0.64) and NcPrx2 (k = 0.558). The present study demonstrates that NcSAG1 is helpful as an antigen marker and also demonstrates the potential immunodiagnostic capabilities of NcPrx2 and NcMIC4, which could serve as alternative diagnostic markers for detecting infection in cattle. These markers may find utility in future treatment management, surveillance, and risk assessment of neosporosis in livestock or other animal host species. Further research should be directed toward understanding the in vivo immune response differences resulting from immunization with both recombinant proteins.
牛新孢子虫病是全球范围内牛流产的主要原因之一,给牛肉和乳制品行业造成了严重的经济损失。由于缺乏针对新孢子虫病的有效治疗方法或疫苗,因此迫切需要一种高度灵敏且特异的诊断方法来评估该病的流行病学情况及其监测和管理。在本研究中,评估了过氧化物还原酶2(NcPrx2)、微小膜体蛋白4(NcMIC4)和表面抗原1(NcSAG1)检测牛抗新孢子虫IgG抗体的免疫诊断性能,并与间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)进行了比较。结果显示,NcSAG1的敏感性和特异性最高,分别为88.4%和80.7%,其次是NcPrx2,敏感性高(87.0%)但特异性低(67.0%),而与IFAT相比,NcMIC4的敏感性和特异性分别为84.1%和78.9%。观察到NcSAG1重组蛋白的一致性程度较高(k = 0.713),显示出最高的诊断能力,其次是NcMIC4(k = 0.64)和NcPrx2(k = 0.558)。本研究表明,NcSAG1作为一种抗原标志物很有帮助,同时也证明了NcPrx2和NcMIC4潜在的免疫诊断能力,它们可作为检测牛新孢子虫感染的替代诊断标志物。这些标志物可能在未来家畜或其他动物宿主新孢子虫病的治疗管理、监测和风险评估中发挥作用。应进一步开展研究,以了解用这两种重组蛋白免疫后体内免疫反应的差异。