Suppr超能文献

不同化疗方案治疗三阴性乳腺癌的病理完全缓解:基于 3 期临床试验的更新网络荟萃分析。

Different Chemotherapy Regimens and Pathologic Complete Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis of Phase 3 Trials.

机构信息

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio, Italy.

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 19;60(2):341. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020341.

Abstract

: Currently, the standard treatment for non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) consists of a systemic neoadjuvant (or perioperative) anthracycline plus taxane-based chemotherapy, delivered either sequentially or concomitantly. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the relative efficacy of different neoadjuvant treatments for TNBC in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR). : The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from database inception to 1 November 2023. Randomized clinical trials were used that enrolled adults with stage I-III TNBC and provided data on pCR defined as residual ypT0/TisN0M0. Between-group comparisons were estimated using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). The primary outcome was the pCR rate. : 1129 citations were screened, and 12 randomized clinical trials were included. In Bayesian comparisons, all regimens, except anthracycline/taxanes plus gemcitabine or capecitabine, resulted in a higher pCR than the standard regimen in both direct and indirect comparisons. In particular, immunotherapy-based regimens resulted in more than double the pCR compared to historical regimens (RR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.9-2.9) and ranked as being the optimal regimen with a probability of 97%. Disease-free survival was better for immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy (HR = 0.36, 95% 1.21-2.09) than for historical regimens. : This meta-analysis confirmed that incorporating immunotherapy with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is the best option to guarantee remarkable pathologic downstaging and improve clinical outcomes.

摘要

目前,非转移性三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的标准治疗包括系统新辅助(或围手术期)蒽环类药物加紫杉烷类化疗,可序贯或同时给药。我们进行了一项网络荟萃分析(NMA),以比较不同新辅助治疗方案在 TNBC 患者病理完全缓解(pCR)方面的相对疗效。

从数据库创建到 2023 年 11 月 1 日,我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库。纳入了入组 I-III 期 TNBC 成年患者、并提供了残留ypT0/TisN0M0 定义的 pCR 数据的随机临床试验。使用风险比(RR)和 95%可信区间(95% CrI)来估计组间比较。主要结局是 pCR 率。

筛选了 1129 条引文,纳入了 12 项随机临床试验。在贝叶斯比较中,除了蒽环类药物/紫杉烷类药物加吉西他滨或卡培他滨外,所有方案在直接和间接比较中均比标准方案导致更高的 pCR。特别是,免疫治疗方案与历史方案相比,pCR 增加了一倍以上(RR=2.3,95%CI 1.9-2.9),且有 97%的概率被评为最佳方案。与历史方案相比,免疫检查点抑制剂化疗的无病生存率更好(HR=0.36,95%CI 1.21-2.09)。

这项荟萃分析证实,将免疫疗法与新辅助铂类化疗相结合是保证显著病理降期和改善临床结局的最佳选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d770/10890456/146e308df8dd/medicina-60-00341-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验