Oral medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, El-Giesh St, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 24;24(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04036-9.
Prematurity resulted from pathological migration of periodontally involved teeth with the loss of vertical stopping points between teeth, which can lead to teeth over eruption with dimensional changes favoring occlusal discrepancies. Therefore, evaluating and comparing the effect of guided tissue regeneration followed by orthodontic intrusion as opposed to orthodontic intrusion tracked by guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of an over-erupted tooth with angular bone loss.
Twenty teeth in ten cases were selected with at least two teeth with vertical over-eruption and angular bone loss with the presence of their opposing. In group one, ten teeth over-erupted were treated by guided tissue regeneration followed by orthodontic intrusion, whereas, in group two, ten teeth over-erupted were treated by orthodontic intrusion followed by guided tissue regeneration. They were evaluated clinically for pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and tooth mobility. Radiographical evaluation assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Clinically, there existed a statistically significant difference (P value ≤ 0.05) in favor of group one at six months post and in favor of group two at one year from re-evaluation regarding pocket depth and tooth mobility. Radiographically, in group one, there was a statistically significant improvement (P value ≤ 0.05) at six months post-guided tissue regeneration or orthodontic intrusion regarding defect depth and dimensional changes of the defect area, with a statistically significant difference (P value ≤ 0.05) in favor of group two at one year from re-evaluation phase regarding defect depth and defect area dimensional changes.
There was a short-term improvement in group one, which deteriorated over a long period compared with group two, so it is preferable to start orthodontic intrusion before guided tissue regeneration.
牙周病涉及的牙齿病理性迁移,导致牙齿垂直停止点丧失,从而导致牙齿过度萌出,牙齿尺寸发生变化,导致咬合关系不调。因此,评估和比较引导组织再生后正畸内收与引导组织再生跟踪正畸内收治疗伴有角型骨丧失的过度萌出牙齿的效果。
选择十例中至少有两颗牙齿垂直过度萌出和伴有角型骨丧失的牙齿,且存在对颌牙。在第一组中,十颗过度萌出的牙齿采用引导组织再生后正畸内收治疗,而在第二组中,十颗过度萌出的牙齿采用正畸内收后引导组织再生治疗。临床评估包括探诊深度、探诊出血和牙齿松动度。锥形束计算机断层扫描评估影像学评估。
临床方面,六和 12 个月时,第一组在探诊深度和牙齿松动度方面均优于第二组(P 值≤0.05)。影像学方面,第一组在引导组织再生或正畸内收后 6 个月时,缺损深度和缺损面积的尺寸变化有统计学意义(P 值≤0.05),而第二组在 12 个月时,缺损深度和缺损面积的尺寸变化有统计学意义(P 值≤0.05)。
第一组在短期内有所改善,但与第二组相比,在长期内恶化,因此,在引导组织再生前进行正畸内收更为可取。