• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在俄罗斯,多方面干预措施以改善注射吸毒的 HIV 感染者治疗效果的成本比较和潜在可负担性:LINC-II 随机对照试验的经济评估。

Comparative costs and potential affordability of a multifaceted intervention to improve treatment outcomes among people with HIV who inject drugs in Russia: economic evaluation of the LINC-II randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Wits Health Consortium, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Feb;27(2):e26208. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26208.

DOI:10.1002/jia2.26208
PMID:38403887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10895073/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The LINC-II randomized controlled trial in St. Petersburg, Russia for HIV-positive adults who inject drugs found that a multi-component intervention including initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) during admission to an addiction hospital, strengths-based case management and naltrexone significantly increased 12-month HIV viral suppression and ART retention. We conducted a comparative cost analysis to determine if the 12-month cost of the intervention is affordable within the current Russian health system.

METHODS

We used LINC-II trial records and questionnaire responses to calculate the resources utilized by each participant in the study, including inpatient days, medications, laboratory tests, outpatient consultations, case manager interactions and opioid medication treatment. Quantities of resources utilized were multiplied by unit costs for each resource estimated from the service fee or price lists used by the study facilities for each specific service delivered. We report the average cost/study primary (viral suppression at 12 months) or secondary (retention in care at 12 months) outcome/participant in 2021 USD and compare costs between study arms.

RESULTS

The trial enrolled 225 participants (111 intervention, 114 control) between September 2018 and December 2020. Viral suppression, non-suppression and missing suppression results were 28% and 14%, 49% and 37%, and 31% and 41% for the control and intervention arms, respectively. Retention results were 35% and 51% for the control and intervention arms, respectively. The average cost per study participant was $2714 in the control arm and $4342 in the intervention arm. The average cost per participant virally suppressed at 12 months was $3662 (control) and $6355 (intervention). The average cost per participant retained at 12 months was $4050 (control) and $5448 (intervention). For those retained, the cost difference between the arms was comprised of opioid treatment (35%), case management (31%), outpatient visits (18%) and additional days of ART (12%).

CONCLUSIONS

The LINC-II intervention increased the cost of care for HIV-positive people who inject drugs in Russia significantly, but some components of the intervention, particularly earlier initiation of ART and case management, may be justifiable due to their success in reaching a challenging subgroup of the population in need.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT03290391.

摘要

简介

俄罗斯圣彼得堡的 LINC-II 随机对照试验纳入了 HIV 阳性的吸毒者,结果表明,包括在成瘾医院住院期间开始抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)、以优势为基础的个案管理和纳曲酮在内的多组分干预措施显著提高了 12 个月时的 HIV 病毒抑制和 ART 保留率。我们进行了成本比较分析,以确定该干预措施的 12 个月成本在当前俄罗斯卫生系统是否可负担。

方法

我们使用 LINC-II 试验记录和问卷调查的回复来计算研究中每位参与者使用的资源,包括住院天数、药物、实验室检查、门诊咨询、个案管理人员的互动和阿片类药物治疗。使用研究设施提供的每项服务的服务收费或价格表来估计每种资源的单位成本,然后将使用的资源数量乘以单位成本。我们报告了以 2021 年美元计价的每例(12 个月时病毒抑制)或次要(12 个月时治疗保留)结局/参与者的平均成本,并比较了研究组之间的成本。

结果

该试验于 2018 年 9 月至 2020 年 12 月期间纳入了 225 名参与者(111 名干预组,114 名对照组)。对照组和干预组的病毒抑制、未抑制和缺失抑制结果分别为 28%和 14%、49%和 37%,以及 31%和 41%。对照组和干预组的保留结果分别为 35%和 51%。对照组和干预组的每名参与者的平均试验成本分别为 2714 美元和 4342 美元。12 个月时病毒抑制的每名参与者的平均成本分别为 3662 美元(对照组)和 6355 美元(干预组)。12 个月时保留的每名参与者的平均成本分别为 4050 美元(对照组)和 5448 美元(干预组)。对于保留者,臂间的成本差异包括阿片类药物治疗(35%)、个案管理(31%)、门诊就诊(18%)和 ART 附加天数(12%)。

结论

LINC-II 干预措施显著增加了俄罗斯 HIV 阳性吸毒者的治疗成本,但该干预措施的某些组成部分,特别是早期开始 ART 和个案管理,由于它们成功地为有需要的人群中的一个具有挑战性的亚组提供了服务,因此可能是合理的。

临床试验编号

NCT03290391。

相似文献

1
Comparative costs and potential affordability of a multifaceted intervention to improve treatment outcomes among people with HIV who inject drugs in Russia: economic evaluation of the LINC-II randomized controlled trial.在俄罗斯,多方面干预措施以改善注射吸毒的 HIV 感染者治疗效果的成本比较和潜在可负担性:LINC-II 随机对照试验的经济评估。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Feb;27(2):e26208. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26208.
2
Design of a randomized controlled trial to Link Infectious and Narcology Care (LINC-II) in St. Petersburg, Russia.俄罗斯圣彼得堡一项关于传染病与戒毒关爱(LINC-II)的随机对照试验设计。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13722-020-0179-8.
3
Rapid access to antiretroviral therapy, receipt of naltrexone, and strengths-based case management versus standard of care for HIV viral load suppression in people with HIV who inject drugs in Russia (LINC-II): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.在俄罗斯注射吸毒的 HIV 感染者中,快速获得抗逆转录病毒治疗、纳曲酮治疗和基于优势的病例管理与标准护理相比对 HIV 病毒载量抑制的影响(LINC-II):一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet HIV. 2023 Sep;10(9):e578-e587. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00143-1.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Linking Infectious and Narcology Care (LINC) in Russia: design, intervention and implementation protocol.俄罗斯的感染病与戒毒护理联合项目(LINC):设计、干预及实施方案
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2016 May 4;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13722-016-0058-5.
6
Economic evaluation of differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Lesotho: costs to providers and patients.莱索托艾滋病毒治疗差异化服务提供模式的经济评价:提供者和患者的成本。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Apr;24(4):e25692. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25692.
7
Socioeconomic Status and CD4 Count Among People with HIV Who Inject Drugs in St. Petersburg, Russia.俄罗斯圣彼得堡注射吸毒人群的社会经济地位与 CD4 计数
AIDS Behav. 2024 Jul;28(7):2239-2246. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04316-z. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
8
The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a family-based economic empowerment intervention (Suubi + Adherence) on suppression of HIV viral loads among adolescents living with HIV: results from a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in southern Uganda.基于家庭的经济赋权干预(苏比+坚持)对艾滋病毒感染青少年抑制艾滋病毒载量的疗效和成本效益:乌干达南部一项集群随机对照试验的结果。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Jun;24(6):e25752. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25752.
9
Incarceration history, antiretroviral therapy, and stigma: A cross-sectional study of people with HIV who inject drugs in St. Petersburg, Russia.监禁史、抗逆转录病毒疗法和耻辱感:俄罗斯圣彼得堡注射吸毒的 HIV 感染者的横断面研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jan;111:103907. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103907. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 3- vs. 6-monthly dispensing of antiretroviral treatment (ART) for stable HIV patients in community ART-refill groups in Zimbabwe: study protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial.津巴布韦社区抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)补充治疗组中,为病情稳定的艾滋病毒患者每3个月与每6个月分发一次抗逆转录病毒治疗药物的有效性和成本效益:一项实用的整群随机试验研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Jan 29;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2469-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Trends of HIV Infection in the Russian Federation.俄罗斯联邦艾滋病毒感染的现状。
Viruses. 2023 Oct 26;15(11):2156. doi: 10.3390/v15112156.
2
Rapid access to antiretroviral therapy, receipt of naltrexone, and strengths-based case management versus standard of care for HIV viral load suppression in people with HIV who inject drugs in Russia (LINC-II): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.在俄罗斯注射吸毒的 HIV 感染者中,快速获得抗逆转录病毒治疗、纳曲酮治疗和基于优势的病例管理与标准护理相比对 HIV 病毒载量抑制的影响(LINC-II):一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet HIV. 2023 Sep;10(9):e578-e587. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00143-1.
3
HIV in the Russian Federation: mortality, prevalence, risk factors, and current understanding of sexual transmission.俄罗斯联邦的 HIV 疫情:死亡率、流行率、风险因素以及对性传播的现有认识。
AIDS. 2023 Mar 15;37(4):637-645. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003441. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
4
Design of a randomized controlled trial to Link Infectious and Narcology Care (LINC-II) in St. Petersburg, Russia.俄罗斯圣彼得堡一项关于传染病与戒毒关爱(LINC-II)的随机对照试验设计。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13722-020-0179-8.
5
A strengths-based case management intervention to link HIV-positive people who inject drugs in Russia to HIV care.一项基于优势的个案管理干预措施,旨在将俄罗斯注射毒品的 HIV 阳性人群与 HIV 护理联系起来。
AIDS. 2019 Jul 15;33(9):1467-1476. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002230.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Dolutegravir as a First-Line Treatment Option in the HIV-1-Infected Treatment-Naive Patients in Russia.多替拉韦作为俄罗斯初治的HIV-1感染患者一线治疗方案的成本效益
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 Sep;16:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
7
Intervention Packages to Reduce the Impact of HIV and HCV Infections Among People Who Inject Drugs in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A Modeling and Cost-effectiveness Study.减少东欧和中亚注射吸毒者中艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒感染影响的干预措施包:一项建模与成本效益研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 17;5(3):ofy040. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy040. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Initiating antiretroviral therapy for HIV at a patient's first clinic visit: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the rapid initiation of treatment randomized controlled trial.在患者首次门诊就诊时启动抗逆转录病毒疗法治疗HIV:快速启动治疗随机对照试验的成本效益分析
AIDS. 2017 Jul 17;31(11):1611-1619. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001528.
9
Implementation of methadone therapy for opioid use disorder in Russia - a modeled cost-effectiveness analysis.俄罗斯阿片类物质使用障碍美沙酮治疗的实施——一项模型化成本效益分析
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13011-016-0087-9.
10
Treatment outcomes and cost-effectiveness of shifting management of stable ART patients to nurses in South Africa: an observational cohort.南非将稳定的抗逆转录病毒治疗患者的管理转移给护士的治疗结果和成本效益:一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2011 Jul;8(7):e1001055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001055. Epub 2011 Jul 19.