Shizawa Kaoru, Ohtake Makoto, Akimoto Taisuke, Kawasaki Takafumi, Seki Shunsuke, Imanishi Yuya, Yasuda Masaki, Kawasaki Takashi, Sakata Katsumi, Takeuchi Ichiro, Yamamoto Tetsuya
Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, JPN.
Advanced Critical Care and Emergency Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, JPN.
Cureus. 2024 Jan 24;16(1):e52874. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52874. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Introduction This study aimed to determine the optimal timing for surgical intervention and the prognostic factors of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Methods We identified 25 patients with probable CSF leaks from 472 consecutive patients with head trauma. In addition to baseline characteristics and findings on admission, injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury score (AIS), and other factors related to CSF leakage were considered. We analyzed the prognostic factors after setting the primary endpoint as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the time of discharge to determine the appropriate timing for surgical intervention. Results Univariate analysis revealed significantly poorer prognoses for elderly patients (p<0.001) and cases with low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) levels (p=0.039) and high D-dimer levels (p=0.028), which was consistent with findings from the analyses of all patients with head trauma. We found that multiple traumas (AIS≥3 at two or more sites, p=0.047) and high lactate levels (p=0.043) were poor prognostic factors specific to CSF leakage cases, while a longer time to CSF leakage cessation was also associated with a poorer prognosis (median, six days versus 13 days, p=0.014). An evaluation of the time to closure found that spontaneous cessation occurred within 14 days in most cases. Conclusions Conservative medical treatment is the first choice for most cases of traumatic CSF leakage. Surgical intervention should be considered if leakage does not cease after 14 days post injury. Furthermore, severe multiple injuries and high lactate levels were poor prognostic factors specific to patients with CSF leakage.
引言 本研究旨在确定手术干预的最佳时机以及脑脊液(CSF)漏的预后因素。方法 我们从472例连续的颅脑外伤患者中识别出25例可能存在脑脊液漏的患者。除了基线特征和入院时的检查结果外,还考虑了损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、简明损伤评分(AIS)以及与脑脊液漏相关的其他因素。我们将出院时的改良Rankin量表(mRS)设定为主要终点,分析预后因素以确定手术干预的合适时机。结果 单因素分析显示,老年患者(p<0.001)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分低的病例(p=0.039)和D-二聚体水平高的病例(p=0.028)的预后明显较差,这与对所有颅脑外伤患者的分析结果一致。我们发现多发伤(两个或更多部位的AIS≥3,p=0.047)和高乳酸水平(p=0.043)是脑脊液漏病例特有的不良预后因素,而脑脊液漏停止时间较长也与较差的预后相关(中位数,6天对13天,p=0.014)。对闭合时间的评估发现,大多数情况下脑脊液漏会在14天内自行停止。结论 对于大多数外伤性脑脊液漏病例,保守药物治疗是首选。如果伤后14天漏液仍未停止,则应考虑手术干预。此外,严重多发伤和高乳酸水平是脑脊液漏患者特有的不良预后因素。