Larsson Johan E, Kristensen Søren Lund, Deis Tania, Warming Peder E, Graversen Peter L, Schou Morten, Køber Lars, Rossing Kasper, Gustafsson Finn
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jun;43(6):920-930. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.02.1452. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with a lower likelihood of referral for advanced heart failure (HF) evaluation, but it is not known whether it influences rates of advanced HF therapies independently of key hemodynamic measures and comorbidity following advanced HF evaluation in a universal healthcare system.
We linked data from a single-center Danish clinical registry of consecutive patients evaluated for advanced HF with patient-level information on socioeconomic status. Patients were divided into groups based on the level of education (low, medium, and high), combined degree of socioeconomic deprivation (low, medium, and high), and household income quartiles. Rates of the combined outcome of left ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation (advanced HF therapy) with death as a competing risk were estimated with cumulative incidence functions, and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, central venous pressure, cardiac index, and comorbidities.
We included 629 patients, median age 53 years, of whom 77% were men. During a median follow-up of 5 years, 179 (28%) underwent advanced HF therapy. The highest level of education was associated with higher rates (high vs low, adjusted HR 1.81 95% CI 1.14-2.89, p = 0.01), whereas household income quartile groups (Q4 vs Q1, adjusted HR 1.37 95% CI 0.76-2.47, p = 0.30) or groups of combined socioeconomic deprivation (high vs low degree of deprivation, adjusted HR 0.86 95% CI 0.50-1.46, p = 0.56) were not significantly associated with rates of advanced HF therapy.
Patients with a lower level of education might be disfavored for advanced HF therapies and could require specific attention in the advanced HF care center.
社会经济剥夺与晚期心力衰竭(HF)评估转诊可能性较低相关,但在全民医疗体系中,晚期HF评估后,社会经济剥夺是否独立于关键血流动力学指标和合并症影响晚期HF治疗率尚不清楚。
我们将来自丹麦单中心连续接受晚期HF评估患者的临床登记数据与患者社会经济状况的个体水平信息相联系。患者根据教育水平(低、中、高)、社会经济剥夺综合程度(低、中、高)和家庭收入四分位数分组。以死亡作为竞争风险,采用累积发病率函数估计左心室辅助装置植入或心脏移植(晚期HF治疗)联合结局的发生率,并采用Cox比例风险模型对年龄、性别、中心静脉压、心脏指数和合并症进行校正。
我们纳入了629例患者,中位年龄53岁,其中77%为男性。中位随访5年期间,179例(28%)接受了晚期HF治疗。最高教育水平与较高的治疗率相关(高学历与低学历相比,校正后HR 1.81,95%CI 1.14 - 2.89,p = 0.01),而家庭收入四分位数组(Q4与Q1相比,校正后HR 1.37,95%CI 0.76 - 2.47,p = 0.30)或社会经济剥夺综合程度组(高剥夺程度与低剥夺程度相比,校正后HR 0.86,95%CI 0.50 - 1.46,p = 0.56)与晚期HF治疗率无显著相关性。
教育水平较低的患者可能在晚期HF治疗中处于不利地位,在晚期HF护理中心可能需要特别关注。