Cherian Jerald P, Helsel Taylor N, Jones George F, Virk Zunaira, Salinas Alejandra, Grieb Suzanne M, Klein Eili Y, Tamma Pranita D, Cosgrove Sara E
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Center for Child and Community Health Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 30;4(1):e13. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.2. eCollection 2024.
To (1) understand the role of antibiotic-associated adverse events (ABX-AEs) on antibiotic decision-making, (2) understand clinician preferences for ABX-AE feedback, and (3) identify ABX-AEs of greatest clinical concern.
Focus groups.
Academic medical center.
Medical and surgical house staff, attending physicians, and advanced practice practitioners.
Focus groups were conducted from May 2022 to December 2022. Participants discussed the role of ABX-AEs in antibiotic decision-making and feedback preferences and evaluated the prespecified categorization of ABX-AEs based on degree of clinical concern. Thematic analysis was conducted using inductive coding.
Four focus groups were conducted ( = 15). Six themes were identified. (1) ABX-AE risks during initial prescribing influence the antibiotic prescribed rather than the decision of to prescribe. (2) The occurrence of an ABX-AE leads to reassessment of the clinical indication for antibiotic therapy. (3) The impact of an ABX-AE on other management decisions is as important as the direct harm of the ABX-AE. (4) ABX-AEs may be overlooked because of limited feedback regarding the occurrence of ABX-AEs. (5) Clinicians are receptive to feedback regarding ABX-AEs but are concerned about it being punitive. (6) Feedback must be curated to prevent clinicians from being overwhelmed with data. Clinicians generally agreed with the prespecified categorizations of ABX-AEs by degree of clinical concern.
The themes identified and assessment of ABX-AEs of greatest clinical concern may inform antibiotic stewardship initiatives that incorporate reporting of ABX-AEs as a strategy to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use.
(1)了解抗生素相关不良事件(ABX-AEs)在抗生素决策中的作用;(2)了解临床医生对抗生素相关不良事件反馈的偏好;(3)确定最受临床关注的抗生素相关不良事件。
焦点小组。
学术医疗中心。
内科和外科住院医师、主治医师及高级执业医师。
于2022年5月至2022年12月进行焦点小组讨论。参与者讨论了抗生素相关不良事件在抗生素决策中的作用及反馈偏好,并根据临床关注程度对预先设定的抗生素相关不良事件分类进行评估。采用归纳编码进行主题分析。
共进行了4个焦点小组讨论(n = 15)。确定了6个主题。(1)初始处方时抗生素相关不良事件的风险影响所开具的抗生素,而非是否开具抗生素的决定。(2)抗生素相关不良事件的发生会导致对抗生素治疗临床指征的重新评估。(3)抗生素相关不良事件对其他管理决策的影响与该不良事件的直接危害同样重要。(4)由于关于抗生素相关不良事件发生情况的反馈有限,这些不良事件可能被忽视。(5)临床医生接受关于抗生素相关不良事件的反馈,但担心其具有惩罚性。(6)必须精心整理反馈信息,以免临床医生被数据淹没。临床医生普遍同意根据临床关注程度对预先设定的抗生素相关不良事件分类。
所确定的主题以及对最受临床关注的抗生素相关不良事件的评估,可能为抗生素管理举措提供信息,这些举措将抗生素相关不良事件的报告纳入其中,作为减少不必要抗生素使用的一项策略。