Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC, Department of Intensive Care, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Feb 28;13(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01378-5.
The application of hand hygiene (HH) and the use of non-sterile gloves (NSG) in daily care is highly intertwined. We aimed (1) to assess the combined application of HH and NSG among nurses and (2) to explore determinants that influence their ability to combine both measures in their care.
In a multi-methods study, we combined direct observations of care episodes with semi-structured interviews with nurses in two affiliated university hospitals. Topics were based on Flottorp's checklist of determinants of practice.
In total, we observed 205 care episodes and interviewed 10 nurses. Observations revealed that the combination of NSG and HH was correctly applied in 19% of care episodes in which a single procedure was executed, and in 2% of care episodes in which multiple procedures were performed. From the interviews, we found determinants that influenced compliance, covered mainly by three out of seven of Flottorp's checklist domains. Nurses indicated that their knowledge of protocols was limited to HH and protocols were hardly ever actively consulted; visual reminders within their workplace were used as sources of information. Nurses' behavior was primarily influenced by their ability to operationalize this information and their ability to integrate both infection prevention measures into their care. The intention to apply and combine HH and NSG use was influenced by their risk assessment of cross-contamination, by the urge to self-protect and gut feeling. The feasibility to execute HH and NSG protocols is influenced by the urgency and the complexity of the care episode.
The combined correct application with HH and NSG measures by nurses is low. Nurses are instructed in a fragmented way while in the day to day care HH and NSG use are highly intertwined. Operationalization and simplification of infection prevention protocols, in which instructions on both infection prevention measures are fused, should be considered. Strategies to improve practice should consider the power of habit and nurses urge to self-protect.
在日常护理中,手部卫生(HH)的应用和非无菌手套(NSG)的使用高度交织在一起。我们的目的是:(1)评估护士HH 和 NSG 的联合应用情况;(2)探索影响他们在护理中同时实施这两项措施能力的决定因素。
在一项多方法研究中,我们将护理事件的直接观察与两所附属医院的护士进行的半结构化访谈相结合。主题基于 Flottorp 的实践决定因素清单。
共观察了 205 个护理事件,采访了 10 名护士。观察结果显示,在执行单一操作的护理事件中,NSG 和 HH 的联合应用正确执行率为 19%,在执行多项操作的护理事件中,正确执行率为 2%。从访谈中,我们发现了影响依从性的决定因素,这些因素主要涵盖了 Flottorp 清单中七个领域中的三个领域。护士表示,他们对协议的了解仅限于 HH,并且很少主动查阅协议;他们将工作场所内的视觉提示作为信息来源。护士的行为主要受他们对信息的操作能力以及将这两种感染预防措施整合到护理中的能力的影响。执行 HH 和 NSG 协议的意愿受到他们对交叉污染风险的评估、自我保护的冲动和直觉的影响。执行 HH 和 NSG 协议的可行性受到护理事件的紧迫性和复杂性的影响。
护士联合正确应用 HH 和 NSG 措施的情况较低。护士在日常护理中接受的指导是零散的,而 HH 和 NSG 的使用高度交织在一起。应考虑简化和简化感染预防协议,将这两种感染预防措施的说明融合在一起。提高实践的策略应考虑习惯的力量和护士自我保护的冲动。