• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种抗癫痫药物相关心律失常的风险评估:一项系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。

Risk assessment of arrhythmias related to three antiseizure medications: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Yulong, Su Shen, Zhang Mengwen, Yu Limin, Miao Xinyuan, Li Hongjun, Sun Yanping

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 14;15:1295368. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1295368. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1295368
PMID:38419702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10899418/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are first line therapy for seizure disorders. Their effects on arrhythmias, especially the risk of arrhythmias associated with lacosamide (LCM), levetiracetam (LEV), and perampanel (PER), have been intensely investigated.

METHODS

We searched four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) until August 6, 2023. We used a common effects model and reported data as pooled incidence with 95% CIs. Meta-analyses were conducted to elucidate the risk of arrhythmias with different drugs, and Egger's regression was performed to detect publication bias analysis.

RESULTS

We included 11 clinical trials with 1,031 participants. The pooled incidence of arrhythmias in the LEV group was 0.005 (95% CI: 0.001-0.013), while it was 0.014 in the LCM group (95% CI: 0.003-0.030). Publication bias analyses indicated no significant bias in the LEV group ( = 0.02, df = 4, -value = 0.9852) but a significant bias in the LCM group ( = 5.94, df = 3, -value = 0.0095). We corrected for this bias in the LCM group using the trim-and-fill method, which yielded a similar pooled incidence of 0.0137 (95% CI: 0.0036-0.0280), indicating good reliability. Due to insufficient studies, we could not conduct a meta-analysis for PER, and we analyzed them in our systematic review.

CONCLUSION

The use of LCM significantly elevated the risk of arrhythmias, while LEV had non-significant arrhythmogenic effects. As for the arrhythmogenic effects of PER, more clinical trials are needed in the future.

摘要

目的

抗癫痫药物(ASMs)是癫痫疾病的一线治疗药物。它们对心律失常的影响,尤其是与拉科酰胺(LCM)、左乙拉西坦(LEV)和吡仑帕奈(PER)相关的心律失常风险,已得到深入研究。

方法

我们检索了四个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science),检索截止至2023年8月6日。我们使用固定效应模型,并将数据报告为合并发病率及95%置信区间。进行荟萃分析以阐明不同药物导致心律失常的风险,并进行Egger回归以检测发表偏倚分析。

结果

我们纳入了11项临床试验,共1031名参与者。LEV组心律失常的合并发病率为0.005(95%置信区间:0.001 - 0.013),而LCM组为0.014(95%置信区间:0.003 - 0.030)。发表偏倚分析表明,LEV组无显著偏倚(Q = 0.02,自由度 = 4,P值 = 0.9852),但LCM组存在显著偏倚(Q = 5.94,自由度 = 3,P值 = 0.0095)。我们使用修剪填充法对LCM组的这种偏倚进行了校正,校正后合并发病率相似,为0.0137(95%置信区间:0.0036 - 0.0280),表明可靠性良好。由于研究不足,我们无法对PER进行荟萃分析,因此在系统评价中对其进行了分析。

结论

使用LCM显著增加了心律失常的风险,而LEV的致心律失常作用不显著。至于PER的致心律失常作用,未来需要更多的临床试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/3b4111cd3b53/fneur-15-1295368-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/fc492b7a74b4/fneur-15-1295368-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/8ccd40de64bd/fneur-15-1295368-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/1787f7a6d4da/fneur-15-1295368-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/710d9e88d593/fneur-15-1295368-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/3b4111cd3b53/fneur-15-1295368-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/fc492b7a74b4/fneur-15-1295368-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/8ccd40de64bd/fneur-15-1295368-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/1787f7a6d4da/fneur-15-1295368-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/710d9e88d593/fneur-15-1295368-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1222/10899418/3b4111cd3b53/fneur-15-1295368-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk assessment of arrhythmias related to three antiseizure medications: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.三种抗癫痫药物相关心律失常的风险评估:一项系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 14;15:1295368. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1295368. eCollection 2024.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Five Broad-Spectrum Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.五种广谱抗癫痫药物辅助治疗难治性癫痫的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
CNS Drugs. 2023 Oct;37(10):883-913. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-01029-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.第三代抗癫痫药物辅助治疗成人局灶性发作:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2022 Feb;82(2):199-218. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01661-4. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
Effectiveness of antiseizure medications therapy in preventing seizures in brain injury patients: A network meta-analysis.抗癫痫药物治疗对预防脑损伤患者癫痫发作的有效性:一项网状Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 15;13:1001363. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1001363. eCollection 2022.
6
Long-term efficacy and safety of lacosamide and levetiracetam monotherapy in elderly patients with focal epilepsy: A retrospective study.拉科酰胺和左乙拉西坦单药治疗老年局灶性癫痫患者的长期疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 May;94:178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.02.022. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
7
Equipotency of lacosamide to levetiracetam in new onset focal epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial.拉科酰胺与左乙拉西坦治疗新发性局灶性癫痫的等效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):622-628. doi: 10.25259/JNRP_182_2023. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
8
Levetiracetam for Seizure Prophylaxis in Neurocritical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.左乙拉西坦在神经危重症患者中的癫痫预防作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Feb;36(1):248-258. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01296-z. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
9
The effect of lacosamide on psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy.拉科酰胺对癫痫患者精神共病的影响。
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2020 Nov 19;14:100402. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2020.100402. eCollection 2020.
10
Quality of life, mood and seizure control in patients with brain tumor related epilepsy treated with lacosamide as add-on therapy: A prospective explorative study with a historical control group.作为附加疗法使用拉科酰胺治疗脑肿瘤相关性癫痫患者的生活质量、情绪及癫痫控制情况:一项设有历史对照组的前瞻性探索性研究
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Aug;73:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac Electrophysiological Effects of the Sodium Channel-Blocking Antiepileptic Drugs Lamotrigine and Lacosamide.钠通道阻滞剂抗癫痫药物拉莫三嗪和拉科酰胺的心脏电生理效应
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 May 15;18(5):726. doi: 10.3390/ph18050726.
2
Cardiac Conduction Delay for Sodium Channel Antagonist Antiseizure Medications: An Analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.钠通道拮抗剂抗癫痫药物所致心脏传导延迟:加拿大衰老纵向研究分析
Neurology. 2025 Feb 25;104(4):e210302. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210302. Epub 2025 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Neonatal Cardiac Arrest Following Lacosamide Treatment: A Case Report.拉考沙胺治疗后新生儿心搏骤停:病例报告。
Pediatr Neurol. 2023 Dec;149:184-186. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
2
Levetiracetam vs Lamotrigine as First-Line Antiseizure Medication in Female Patients With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.左乙拉西坦与拉莫三嗪作为特发性全面性癫痫女性患者一线抗癫痫药物的比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Nov 1;80(11):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3400.
3
Epilepsy and long-term risk of arrhythmias.癫痫与心律失常的长期风险。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Sep 14;44(35):3374-3382. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad523.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Five Broad-Spectrum Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Refractory Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.五种广谱抗癫痫药物辅助治疗难治性癫痫的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
CNS Drugs. 2023 Oct;37(10):883-913. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-01029-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of immediate switch from sodium channel blockers to Lacosamide.即刻换用拉科酰胺治疗钠离子通道阻滞剂的疗效和耐受性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 Aug;145:109355. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109355. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
6
Nano-delivery systems as a promising therapeutic potential for epilepsy: Current status and future perspectives.纳米递药系统作为治疗癫痫的一种有前途的方法:现状和未来展望。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Nov;29(11):3150-3159. doi: 10.1111/cns.14355. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
7
Drug resistance in epilepsy.癫痫的耐药性。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 Aug;22(8):723-734. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00151-5. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
8
Levetiracetam attenuates diabetes-associated cognitive impairment and microglia polarization by suppressing neuroinflammation.左乙拉西坦通过抑制神经炎症减轻糖尿病相关的认知障碍和小胶质细胞极化。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 4;14:1145819. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1145819. eCollection 2023.
9
Adherence to and persistence with lacosamide, perampanel, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam in adult patients with focal epilepsy in Japan: A descriptive cohort study using a claims database.日本成年局灶性癫痫患者对拉科酰胺、吡仑帕奈、拉莫三嗪和左乙拉西坦的依从性和持续性:一项使用索赔数据库的描述性队列研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 29;9(4):e15017. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15017. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
[Medical Treatment of Epilepsy].[癫痫的医学治疗]
Brain Nerve. 2023 Apr;75(4):347-351. doi: 10.11477/mf.1416202337.