• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读参与度对科学素养的影响——基于XGBoost方法的分析

The effect of reading engagement on scientific literacy - an analysis based on the XGBoost method.

作者信息

Cao Canxi, Zhang Tongxin, Xin Tao

机构信息

Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 14;15:1329724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1329724. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1329724
PMID:38420178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10899671/
Abstract

Scientific literacy is a key factor of personal competitiveness, and reading is the most common activity in daily learning life, and playing the influence of reading on individuals day by day is the most convenient way to improve the level of scientific literacy of all people. Reading engagement is one of the important student characteristics related to reading literacy, which is highly malleable and is jointly reflected by behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement, and it is of theoretical and practical significance to explore the relationship between reading engagement and scientific literacy using reading engagement as an entry point. In this study, we used PISA2018 data from China to explore the relationship between reading engagement and scientific literacy with a sample of 15-year-old students in mainland China. 36 variables related to reading engagement and background variables (gender, grade, and socioeconomic and cultural status of the family) were selected from the questionnaire as the independent variables, and the score of the Scientific Literacy Assessment (SLA) was taken as the outcome variable, and supervised machine learning method, the XGBoost algorithm, to construct the model. The dataset is randomly divided into training set and test set to optimize the model, which can verify that the obtained model has good fitting degree and generalization ability. Meanwhile, global and local personalized interpretation is done by introducing the SHAP value, a cutting-edge machine model interpretation method. It is found that among the three major components of reading engagement, cognitive engagement is the more influential factor, and students with high reading cognitive engagement level are more likely to get high scores in scientific literacy assessment, which is relatively dominant in the model of this study. On the other hand, this study verifies the feasibility of the current popular machine learning model, i.e., XGBoost, in a large-scale international education assessment program, with a better model adaptability and conditions for global and local interpretation.

摘要

科学素养是个人竞争力的关键因素,阅读是日常学习生活中最常见的活动,发挥阅读对个人日益增长的影响是提高全民科学素养水平最便捷的途径。阅读参与度是与阅读素养相关的重要学生特征之一,它具有很强的可塑性,由行为、认知和情感参与共同体现,以阅读参与度为切入点探究其与科学素养之间的关系具有理论和实践意义。在本研究中,我们使用来自中国的PISA2018数据,以中国大陆15岁学生为样本,探究阅读参与度与科学素养之间的关系。从问卷中选取36个与阅读参与度及背景变量(性别、年级以及家庭的社会经济和文化地位)相关的变量作为自变量,将科学素养评估(SLA)得分作为结果变量,采用监督机器学习方法——XGBoost算法构建模型。将数据集随机分为训练集和测试集以优化模型,这可以验证所得到的模型具有良好的拟合度和泛化能力。同时,通过引入前沿的机器模型解释方法SHAP值进行全局和局部个性化解释。研究发现,在阅读参与度的三个主要组成部分中,认知参与度是更具影响力的因素,阅读认知参与度水平高的学生在科学素养评估中更有可能获得高分,这在本研究模型中相对占主导地位。另一方面,本研究验证了当前流行的机器学习模型即XGBoost在大规模国际教育评估项目中的可行性,具有较好的模型适应性以及进行全局和局部解释的条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/1373bafcad13/fpsyg-15-1329724-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/d8bb80a00ac1/fpsyg-15-1329724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/6816769c6a14/fpsyg-15-1329724-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/9a1024cd7d55/fpsyg-15-1329724-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/4ba74d7ba377/fpsyg-15-1329724-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/c0c581e26219/fpsyg-15-1329724-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/1f8fdd8319b6/fpsyg-15-1329724-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/8bb5f0606efb/fpsyg-15-1329724-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/34c2b5bcfc3f/fpsyg-15-1329724-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/ed77bec3ff7a/fpsyg-15-1329724-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/bd232242f49e/fpsyg-15-1329724-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/e3a9f00e6f23/fpsyg-15-1329724-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/1373bafcad13/fpsyg-15-1329724-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/d8bb80a00ac1/fpsyg-15-1329724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/6816769c6a14/fpsyg-15-1329724-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/9a1024cd7d55/fpsyg-15-1329724-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/4ba74d7ba377/fpsyg-15-1329724-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/c0c581e26219/fpsyg-15-1329724-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/1f8fdd8319b6/fpsyg-15-1329724-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/8bb5f0606efb/fpsyg-15-1329724-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/34c2b5bcfc3f/fpsyg-15-1329724-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/ed77bec3ff7a/fpsyg-15-1329724-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/bd232242f49e/fpsyg-15-1329724-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/e3a9f00e6f23/fpsyg-15-1329724-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/10899671/1373bafcad13/fpsyg-15-1329724-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of reading engagement on scientific literacy - an analysis based on the XGBoost method.阅读参与度对科学素养的影响——基于XGBoost方法的分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 14;15:1329724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1329724. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors influencing secondary school students' reading literacy: An analysis based on XGBoost and SHAP methods.影响中学生阅读素养的因素:基于XGBoost和SHAP方法的分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:948612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948612. eCollection 2022.
3
Prediction of effective sociodemographic variables in modeling health literacy: A machine learning approach.预测建模健康素养中的有效社会人口变量:一种机器学习方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Oct;178:105167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105167. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
4
Research on the Influence Path of Metacognitive Reading Strategies on Scientific Literacy.元认知阅读策略对科学素养的影响路径研究
J Intell. 2023 Apr 23;11(5):78. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050078.
5
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Do Textbooks Matter for Reading Comprehension? A Study in Flemish Primary Education.教科书对阅读理解重要吗?一项关于佛兰芒语小学教育的研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 21;10:2959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02959. eCollection 2019.
8
Systemic Approach to the Development of Reading Literacy: Family Resources, School Grades, and Reading Motivation in Fourth-Grade Pupils.阅读素养发展的系统方法:四年级学生的家庭资源、学业成绩和阅读动机
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 20;11:37. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00037. eCollection 2020.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Adults' reading engagement and wellbeing in Aotearoa New Zealand.新西兰成年人的阅读参与度和幸福感。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 28;18(9):e0286706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286706. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying Machine Learning and SHAP Method to Identify Key Influences on Middle-School Students' Mathematics Literacy Performance.应用机器学习和SHAP方法识别对中学生数学素养表现的关键影响因素。
J Intell. 2024 Sep 26;12(10):93. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12100093.
2
Augmented reality books: in-depth insights into children's reading engagement.增强现实图书:对儿童阅读参与度的深入洞察。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1423163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1423163. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Classroom Practices on Reading Comprehension, Engagement, and Motivations for Adolescents.课堂实践对青少年阅读理解、参与度和学习动机的影响。
Read Res Q. 2014 Oct 1;49(4):387-416. doi: 10.1002/rrq.81.