Kurotschka Peter K, Hemkeppler Juliane, Gierszewski David, Ghirotto Luca, Gágyor Ildikó
Department of General Practice, University Hospital Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
Department of General Practice, University Hospital Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0224. Print 2024 Oct.
To be effective, interventions aimed at increasing the appropriateness of antibiotic use in primary care should consider the perspectives of prescribing physicians.
To explore the decision making of general practitioners (GPs) when managing uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) in women.
DESIGN & SETTING: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 22 GPs in Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg (southern Germany).
Verbatim transcripts were analysed through inductive qualitative content analysis.
We generated the following three main themes: factors facilitating the decision making; factors complicating the decision making; and consultation modalities. According to participants, following evidence-based recommendations makes the prescription decision smoother. GPs' and patients' prior experiences and beliefs guides decisions towards certain antibiotics, even if those experiences and beliefs contradict evidence-based recommendations. Patient expectations and demands also condition antibiotic prescribing, favouring it. Organisational constraints, such as time pressure, the day of the week (for example, before weekends), and a lower cost of antibiotics for patients than alternative treatments favour the decision to prescribe antibiotics. Diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty complicates decision making, as does scepticism towards evidence-based recommendations. Discordance within the patient-doctor relationship contributed to this complexity. Regarding consultation modalities, a more in-depth consultation and shared decision making were seen as helpful in this process.
We identified different factors as intervening against or for a straightforward management decision when dealing with women with uUTIs. They reveal the complexity behind the GPs' decision making. Providing GPs with easy-to-apply guidance while removing economic constraints to allocate sufficient consultation time, and supporting shared decision making may help GPs appropriately manage uUTIs in women.
为使干预措施有效,旨在提高基层医疗中抗生素使用合理性的干预措施应考虑开处方医生的观点。
探讨全科医生(GPs)在处理女性单纯性尿路感染(uUTIs)时的决策过程。
一项定性研究,对德国南部巴伐利亚州和巴登 - 符腾堡州的22名全科医生进行半结构化访谈。
通过归纳定性内容分析法对逐字记录进行分析。
我们得出以下三个主要主题:促进决策的因素;使决策复杂化的因素;以及咨询方式。根据参与者的说法,遵循循证建议可使处方决策更加顺利。全科医生和患者先前的经验和信念会引导他们选择某些抗生素,即使这些经验和信念与循证建议相矛盾。患者的期望和需求也会影响抗生素的处方,促使医生开处方。组织限制因素,如时间压力、一周中的日子(例如周末前)以及抗生素对患者来说比替代治疗成本更低,都有利于做出开抗生素的决定。诊断和预后的不确定性使决策变得复杂,对循证建议的怀疑也是如此。医患关系中的不一致加剧了这种复杂性。关于咨询方式,更深入的咨询和共同决策在这个过程中被认为是有帮助的。
我们确定了在处理患有uUTIs的女性时,有不同因素阻碍或支持直接的管理决策。它们揭示了全科医生决策背后的复杂性。为全科医生提供易于应用的指导,消除经济限制以分配足够的咨询时间,并支持共同决策,可能有助于全科医生恰当地处理女性的uUTIs。