Sasaki Koji, Ravandi Farhad, Kadia Tapan, DiNardo Courtney D, Yilmaz Musa, Short Nicholas, Jabbour Elias, Patel Keyur P, Loghavi Sanam, Pierce Sherry, Borthakur Gautam, Kantarjian Hagop
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 Jun;24(6):375-381. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.01.015. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
The outcome of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has improved significantly since the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) as APL therapies. The optimal therapy for APL relapse is believed to require autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) based on historical experience.
To evaluate the outcome of patients with relapsed APL before and after the era of ATRA-ATO.
We reviewed 61 patients with relapsed APL treated from November 1991 to June 2023; 31 patients (51%) received modern therapy with the combination of ATRA and ATO with and without idarubicin and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO).
Overall, 56 patients (92%) achieved CR after the first salvage therapy; 20 patients received SCT (10 autologous SCT;10 allogeneic SCT). With a median follow-up time of 138 months, the median survival durations were 32 months and 164 months with historical therapy vs. modern (ATRA-ATO) therapy (P = .035); the 5-year survival rates were 44% vs. 71%. With a 10-month landmark analysis, the median survival durations were 102 months vs. not reached, and the 5-year survival rates were 57% and 70% without SCT vs. with SCT (P = .193). The survival benefit with SCT was more prominent in the historical therapy era. However, patients who received the modern combination therapy of ATRA-ATO with and without idarubicin and GO had similar outcomes without vs. with SCT (P = .848).
The combination of ATRA-ATO (+/- GO and idarubicin) is a highly effective salvage therapy in relapsed APL. The use of SCT may not be needed after first relapse-second remission but may be considered in subsequent relapses.
自从引入全反式维甲酸(ATRA)和三氧化二砷(ATO)作为急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)的治疗方法以来,APL患者的预后有了显著改善。根据以往经验,APL复发的最佳治疗方法被认为需要自体或异基因干细胞移植(SCT)。
评估在ATRA - ATO时代前后复发APL患者的预后。
我们回顾了1991年11月至2023年6月期间接受治疗的61例复发APL患者;31例患者(51%)接受了ATRA和ATO联合或不联合伊达比星及吉妥珠单抗奥唑米星(GO)的现代治疗。
总体而言,56例患者(92%)在首次挽救治疗后达到完全缓解(CR);20例患者接受了SCT(10例自体SCT;10例异基因SCT)。中位随访时间为138个月,历史治疗组与现代(ATRA - ATO)治疗组的中位生存时间分别为32个月和164个月(P = 0.035);5年生存率分别为44%和71%。经过10个月的标志性分析,无SCT组与有SCT组的中位生存时间分别为102个月和未达到,5年生存率分别为57%和70%(P = 0.193)。在历史治疗时代,SCT的生存获益更为显著。然而,接受ATRA - ATO联合或不联合伊达比星及GO的现代联合治疗患者,有无SCT的预后相似(P = 0.848)。
ATRA - ATO(±GO和伊达比星)联合治疗是复发APL的一种高效挽救治疗方法。首次复发至二次缓解后可能无需使用SCT,但后续复发时可考虑使用。