Bernat James L, Khush Kiran K, Shemie Sam D, Hartwig Matthew G, Reese Peter P, Dalle Ave Anne, Parent Brendan, Glazier Alexandra K, Capron Alexander M, Craig Matt, Gofton Teneille, Gordon Elisa J, Healey Andrew, Homan Mary E, Ladin Keren, Messer Simon, Murphy Nick, Nakagawa Thomas A, Parker William F, Pentz Rebecca D, Rodríguez-Arias David, Schwartz Bryanna, Sulmasy Daniel P, Truog Robert D, Wall Anji E, Wall Stephen P, Wolpe Paul R, Fenton Kathleen N
Department of Neurology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jun;43(6):1021-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.02.1455. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
In a workshop sponsored by the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, experts identified current knowledge gaps and research opportunities in the scientific, conceptual, and ethical understanding of organ donation after the circulatory determination of death and its technologies. To minimize organ injury from warm ischemia and produce better recipient outcomes, innovative techniques to perfuse and oxygenate organs postmortem in situ, such as thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion, are being implemented in several medical centers in the US and elsewhere. These technologies have improved organ outcomes but have raised ethical and legal questions. Re-establishing donor circulation postmortem can be viewed as invalidating the condition of permanent cessation of circulation on which the earlier death determination was made and clamping arch vessels to exclude brain circulation can be viewed as inducing brain death. Alternatively, TA-NRP can be viewed as localized in-situ organ perfusion, not whole-body resuscitation, that does not invalidate death determination. Further scientific, conceptual, and ethical studies, such as those identified in this workshop, can inform and help resolve controversies raised by this practice.
在美国国立心肺血液研究所主办的一次研讨会上,专家们确定了在科学、概念及伦理层面理解循环判定死亡后的器官捐献及其技术方面目前存在的知识空白和研究机会。为了将热缺血对器官造成的损伤降至最低并为受者带来更好的结果,美国及其他地区的多家医疗中心正在采用一些创新性技术,如胸腹常温局部灌注,在体外对器官进行灌注和供氧。这些技术改善了器官的状况,但也引发了伦理和法律问题。死后重建供体循环可被视为使早期判定死亡所依据的循环永久停止这一状况无效,而钳夹主动脉弓血管以排除脑部循环可被视为诱发脑死亡。或者,胸腹常温局部灌注可被视为局部原位器官灌注,而非全身复苏,不会使死亡判定无效。进一步开展科学、概念及伦理研究,比如本次研讨会上确定的那些研究,能够为这一做法引发的争议提供信息并有助于解决这些争议。