Liu Feng, Lei Qing, Cai Lihong, Jiang Minghui, Yang Hongqi, Wang Kang, Ding Zhou, Liu Wenqian
Department of Orthopedics, Third Hospital of Changsha, Changsha 410015.
3D Printing Technology Medical Application Research Institute of Changsha, Changsha 410015.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Nov 28;48(11):1703-1710. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.230122.
The effect of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone-attached guide plate assisted cannulated screw fixation of pelvic fracture is reliable, but extensive soft tissue dissection is still required when installing the guide plate. This study aims to compare the efficacy of posterior pelvic ring fracture fixation with iliosacral screw insertion between the assistance of modified percutaneous patient specific 3D printed guide template and conventional fluoroscopy.
From May, 2019 and September 2021, 28 patients sustained posterior pelvic ring fractures were randomized into 2 groups: A guide template group, in which the iliosacral screw was inserted for fixation of the posterior pelvic ring fracture with the assistance of modified percutaneous patient specific 3D printed guide template, and a fluoroscopy group, in which the iliosacral screw was inserted under the guidance of conventional fluoroscopy. The operation time, fluoroscopic frequency, intraoperative blood loss, and incision length were recorded for each screw insertion. Fracture reduction was evaluated according to the Matta criteria. The screw position was evaluated according to the modified Gras classification, and the functional outcome was evaluated according to Majeed score. The parameters of both groups were compared, and statistical analysis was performed.
All the 28 patients were followed up for 12-24 months. Of them, 15 iliosacral screws were inserted in 14 patients in the guide template group, and 14 iliosacral screws were inserted in 14 patients in the fluoroscopy group. The operation time, fluoroscopic frequency, screw deviation, incision length, and blood loss in the guide template group were 20-30(25.8±2.8) min, 9-15(12.2±1.9), 2-4(2.6±0.7) mm, 4-5(4.6±0.5) cm, and 5-10 (7.8±1.7) mL, respectively, whereas those in the fluoroscopy group were 30-60(48.1±7.5) min, 40-96(64.7±16.3), 3-6(4.2±0.9) mm, 0.8-1.2(1.0±0.1) cm, and 2-5(3.1±1.3) mL, respectively, and there were statistical significance (all <0.001). Fracture reduction was evaluated according to the Matta criteria, and all the patients reached excellence and good (=0.584) in the 2 groups. According to modified Gras classification, there were 12 Grade I screws, 3 Grade II screws, and 0 Grade III screws in the guide template group, and 10 Grade I screws, 3 Grade II screws, and 1 Grade III screw in the fluoroscopy group, with no statistical significance (=0.334). The functional outcome was evaluated according to Majeed score at the last follow-up, without significant difference between the guide template group and the fluoroscopy group (=0.908).
Compared with the conventional fluoroscopy, it would cost less operation time, less fluoroscopic frequency and increase more accurate screw insertion to fixate the posterior pelvic ring fracture with the assistance of modified percutaneous patient specific 3D printed guide template.
三维(3D)打印骨附着导向板辅助空心螺钉固定骨盆骨折的效果可靠,但安装导向板时仍需广泛的软组织剥离。本研究旨在比较改良经皮个体化3D打印导向模板辅助与传统透视下进行骶髂螺钉置入固定骨盆后环骨折的疗效。
2019年5月至2021年9月,28例骨盆后环骨折患者随机分为2组:导向模板组,在改良经皮个体化3D打印导向模板辅助下置入骶髂螺钉固定骨盆后环骨折;透视组,在传统透视引导下置入骶髂螺钉。记录每次螺钉置入的手术时间、透视次数、术中出血量和切口长度。根据Matta标准评估骨折复位情况。根据改良Gras分类评估螺钉位置,根据Majeed评分评估功能结果。比较两组参数并进行统计学分析。
28例患者均随访12 - 24个月。其中,导向模板组14例患者置入15枚骶髂螺钉,透视组14例患者置入14枚骶髂螺钉。导向模板组的手术时间、透视次数、螺钉偏差、切口长度和出血量分别为20 - 30(25.8±2.8)分钟、9 - 15(12.2±1.9)次、2 - 4(2.6±0.7)毫米、4 - 5(4.6±0.5)厘米和5 - 10(7.8±1.7)毫升,而透视组分别为30 - 60(48.1±7.5)分钟、40 - 96(64.7±16.3)次、3 - 6(4.2±0.9)毫米、0.8 - 1.2(1.0±0.1)厘米和2 - 5(3.1±1.3)毫升,差异均有统计学意义(均<0.001)。根据Matta标准评估骨折复位情况,两组患者均达到优和良(=0.584)。根据改良Gras分类,导向模板组有12枚I级螺钉、3枚II级螺钉和0枚III级螺钉,透视组有10枚I级螺钉、3枚II级螺钉和1枚III级螺钉,差异无统计学意义(=0.334)。末次随访时根据Majeed评分评估功能结果,导向模板组与透视组之间无显著差异(=0.908)。
与传统透视相比,改良经皮个体化3D打印导向模板辅助固定骨盆后环骨折手术时间更短、透视次数更少,螺钉置入更准确。