Ali Mahmoud A, Raju Muppala Prasanth, Miller Greg, Vora Niraj, Beeram Madhava, Raju Venkata, Shetty Ashith, Govande Vinayak, Nguyen Nguyen, Chiruvolu Arpitha
Pediatrics/Neonatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
Neonatology, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 3;16(2):e53512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53512. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Premedication in neonates undergoing elective intubation effectively minimizes the negative physiological events of bradycardia, systemic hypertension, intracranial hypertension, and hypoxia. Premedication decreases procedure-related pain and discomfort. This study aimed to evaluate the current practice of pre-intubation medications for non-emergent intubations in preterm and term neonates in the United States.
A cross-sectional survey (Appendix) was sent via e-mail to all level 3 and 4 Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) of the Organization of Neonatal Perinatal Medicine Training Program Directors (ONTPD), NICU directors with pediatric residency only, and Baylor Scott and White Health, Mednax, and Envision health services systems.
Of 170 responses, 41% (69/168) routinely premedicate, 38% (64/168) premedicate under specific circumstances, and 21% (35/168) do not administer any routine pre-intubation medications. Only 46% (77/168) of units had a written policy. The most frequently used drugs were fentanyl (68%, 116/170), atropine (39%, 66/170), midazolam (38%, 64/170), and morphine (26%, 45/170). 21% (36/170) used a two-drug combination, and 38% (64/170) used a three-drug combination. The most commonly used two-drug combination was atropine and fentanyl, and the most common three-drug combination was atropine, fentanyl, and a paralytic agent.
Despite the well-documented benefits of premedication for NICU intubations, as aligned with AAP recommendations, the US lags behind other nations, with stagnant rates since 2006. This disparity persists despite a rise in written policies, which exhibit significant content variations. The authors advocate for the adoption of standardized, AAP-aligned policies across all NICUs in the US. Continued research is vital to monitor the progress of this crucial practice and address any underlying barriers to implementation.
对接受择期插管的新生儿进行预处理可有效减少心动过缓、系统性高血压、颅内高压和缺氧等负面生理事件。预处理可减轻与操作相关的疼痛和不适。本研究旨在评估美国早产和足月新生儿非紧急插管前用药的当前实践情况。
通过电子邮件向新生儿围产期医学培训项目主任组织(ONTPD)的所有三级和四级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)、仅设有儿科住院医师项目的NICU主任,以及贝勒·斯科特与怀特医疗集团、Mednax和Envision医疗服务系统发送了一份横断面调查问卷(附录)。
在170份回复中,41%(69/168)常规进行预处理,38%(64/168)在特定情况下进行预处理,21%(35/168)不使用任何常规插管前药物。只有46%(77/168) 的单位有书面政策。最常用的药物是芬太尼(68%,116/170)、阿托品(39%,66/170)、咪达唑仑(38%,64/170)和吗啡(26%,45/170)。21%(36/170)使用两种药物联合,38%(64/170)使用三种药物联合。最常用的两种药物联合是阿托品和芬太尼,最常见的三种药物联合是阿托品、芬太尼和一种麻痹剂。
尽管有充分记录表明预处理对NICU插管有益,且符合美国儿科学会(AAP)的建议,但美国自2006年以来一直滞后于其他国家,使用率停滞不前。尽管书面政策有所增加,但这种差距仍然存在,而且政策内容存在显著差异。作者主张在美国所有NICU采用标准化的、符合AAP的政策。持续研究对于监测这一关键实践的进展并解决实施过程中的任何潜在障碍至关重要。