Verity Aaminah, Tzortziou Brown Victoria
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0021. Print 2024 Oct.
General practice has seen the widespread adoption of remote consulting and triage systems. There is a lack of evidence exploring how inclusion health populations have been impacted by this transformation.
This study aimed to explore the post-pandemic GP access for inclusion health populations, through the lens of those with lived experience, and identify practical recommendations for improving access for this population.
DESIGN & SETTING: A mixed-methods study exploring the direct experience of people from inclusion health groups trying to access GP care in 13 practices in east London.
A mystery shopper exercise involving 39 in-person practice visits and 13 phone calls were undertaken. The findings were reflected on by a multidisciplinary stakeholder group, which identified recommendations for improvements.
Only 31% of the mystery shopper visits ( = 8) resulted in registration and the offer of an appointment to see a GP for an urgent problem. None of the mystery shoppers was able to book an appointment over the phone but = 10/13 felt that they would be able to register and make an appointment if they followed the receptionist's instructions. Most mystery shoppers felt respected, listened to, and understood the information provided to them. Just under half of the practices (46%, = 6) received positive comments on how accessible and supportive their spaces felt. Practice- and system-level recommendations were identified by the stakeholder group.
Ongoing GP access issues persist for inclusion health populations. We identified practice- and system-level recommendations for improving access for this vulnerable population.
全科医疗中远程咨询和分诊系统已得到广泛应用。目前缺乏证据探讨包容性健康人群如何受到这一转变的影响。
本研究旨在通过有实际经历者的视角,探讨疫情后包容性健康人群获得全科医生服务的情况,并确定改善该人群就医机会的实用建议。
一项混合方法研究,探讨伦敦东部13家诊所中包容性健康群体的人们尝试获得全科医生护理的直接体验。
开展了一项神秘顾客活动,包括39次实地诊所就诊和13次电话访问。多学科利益相关者小组对研究结果进行了反思,并确定了改进建议。
在神秘顾客就诊中,只有31%(n = 8)成功注册并获得了就紧急问题预约看全科医生的机会。没有一位神秘顾客能够通过电话预约,但10/13的人认为,如果按照接待员的指示操作,他们能够注册并预约。大多数神秘顾客感到受到尊重、被倾听,并理解所提供的信息。不到一半的诊所(46%,n = 6)在空间的可及性和支持性方面获得了积极评价。利益相关者小组确定了诊所层面和系统层面的建议。
包容性健康人群在获得全科医生服务方面仍然存在持续的问题。我们确定了改善这一弱势群体就医机会的诊所层面和系统层面的建议。