Suppr超能文献

尿激酶与阿替普酶用于复杂性胸腔积液和脓胸的胸膜内纤维蛋白溶解治疗:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

Intrapleural Fibrinolysis with Urokinase versus Alteplase in Complicated Pleural Effusions and Empyema: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Adhikari Sudipt, Marwah Vikas, Choudhary Robin, Pandey Indermani, Kumar Tentu Ajai, Malik Virender, Pemmaraju Arpita, Vasudevan Shrinath, Kapoor Suraj

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Army Institute of Cardiothoracic Sciences (AICTS), Pune, India.

Department of Radiology, Army Institute of Cardiothoracic Sciences (AICTS), Pune, India.

出版信息

Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2024 Jul;87(3):378-385. doi: 10.4046/trd.2022.0168. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) has been used as an effective agent since 1949 for managing complicated pleural effusion and empyema. Several agents, such as streptokinase, urokinase (UK), and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), have been found to be effective with variable effectiveness. However, a head-tohead controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the most frequently used agents, i.e., UK and rt-PA (alteplase) for managing complicated pleural effusion has rarely been reported.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients were randomized in two intervention groups, i.e., UK and rt-PA. The dose of rt-PA was 10 mg, and that of UK was 1.0 lac units. UK was given thrice daily for 2 days, followed by clamping to allow the retainment of drugs in the pleural space for 2 hours. rt-PA was instilled into the pleural space twice daily for 2 days, and intercostal drainage was clamped for 1 hour.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled into the study, of which 84% (n=42) were males and 16% (n=8) were females. Among them, 30 (60%) patients received UK, and 20 (40%) patients received alteplase as IPFT agents. The percentage of mean± standard deviation changes in pleural opacity was -33.0%±9.9% in the UK group and -41.0%±14.9% in the alteplase group, respectively (p=0.014). Pain was the most common adverse side effect, occurring in 60% (n=18) of the patients in the UK group and in 40% (n=8) of the patients in the alteplase group (p=0.24), while fever was the second most common side effect. Patients who reported early (within 6 weeks of onset of symptoms) showed a greater response than those who reported late for the intervention.

CONCLUSION

IPFT is a safe and effective option for managing complicated pleural effusion or empyema, and newer agents, such as alteplase, have greater efficacy and a similar adverse effect profile when compared with conventional agents, such as UK.

摘要

背景

自1949年以来,胸膜内纤维蛋白溶解疗法(IPFT)一直被用作治疗复杂性胸腔积液和脓胸的有效药物。已发现几种药物,如链激酶、尿激酶(UK)和重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA),具有不同程度的疗效。然而,很少有关于比较最常用药物(即UK和rt-PA(阿替普酶))治疗复杂性胸腔积液疗效的头对头对照试验报道。

方法

总共50例患者被随机分为两个干预组,即UK组和rt-PA组。rt-PA的剂量为10mg,UK的剂量为10万单位。UK每天给药3次,共2天,然后夹闭以让药物在胸腔内保留2小时。rt-PA每天向胸腔内注入2次,共2天,肋间引流夹闭1小时。

结果

共有50例患者纳入研究,其中84%(n = 42)为男性,16%(n = 8)为女性。其中,30例(60%)患者接受UK治疗,20例(40%)患者接受阿替普酶作为IPFT药物。UK组胸膜混浊度平均±标准差变化百分比分别为-33.0%±9.9%,阿替普酶组为-41.0%±14.9%(p = 0.014)。疼痛是最常见的不良副作用,UK组60%(n = 18)的患者出现疼痛,阿替普酶组40%(n = 8)的患者出现疼痛(p = 0.24),而发热是第二常见的副作用。早期(症状出现后6周内)报告的患者比晚期报告接受干预的患者反应更大。

结论

IPFT是治疗复杂性胸腔积液或脓胸的一种安全有效的选择,与UK等传统药物相比,阿替普酶等新型药物具有更高的疗效和相似的不良反应谱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a55c/11222100/c383c504969e/trd-2022-0168f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验